首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Quality Assurance in Bachelor and Master Programmes in Public Administration. A Comparative Study
【24h】

Quality Assurance in Bachelor and Master Programmes in Public Administration. A Comparative Study

机译:公共管理学士和硕士课程的质量保证。比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

The master programmes in the field of public administration reveal two trends, and in spite of being contradictory they ensur e both the convergence and specificity imposed by the continentalational realities:?A thematic focus on public management (MPM), public policies (MPP) or public affairs (MPA);?A diversification of the content and didactic methodologies related to the traditions and national public developments.The preoccupations on enhancing the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) are more visible in the context of applying thoroughly the principles of Bologna Declaration. The recent EHEA Ministerial Conference and the Third Bologna Policy Forum in Bucharest have highlighted that EHEA”is constructed on the basis of common European principles and on the growing internationalisation of higher education” and”HEIs welcome the opportunity for evaluation, accreditation or audit that incorporate their diverse activities and have an international added value”. EHEA countries’ focus on promoting Quality Assurance (QA) in higher education has been expressed in institutional building and promotion of contents and practicescompatible at European level. The need for programme internationalization is also supported by QA transnational organizations as well as several projects aimed at joint programmes. In this context, the current paper aims to present, in a comparative approach, the modalities and good practices derived from external QA evaluations for the quality of programmes in the field of public administration, accomplished by the Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) and the European Association for Public Administration Accreditation (EAPAA) for bachelor and master programmes in the National School of Political Studies and Public Administration in Bucharest, Romania. The general research framework will be structured according to the priorities of the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA) and will be based on the self-evaluation reports as well as the reports of external evaluation, accomplished recently by ARACIS and EAPAA experts.
机译:公共行政领域的硕士课程显示出两种趋势,尽管相互矛盾,但它们确保了大陆/国家现实所赋予的趋同性和特殊性:主题为公共管理(MPM),公共政策(MPP) )或公共事务(MPA);?与传统和国家公共发展相关的内容和教学方法的多样化。在充分运用以下原则的背景下,对增强欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)的关注更加明显博洛尼亚宣言。最近的EHEA部长级会议和在布加勒斯特举行的第三届博洛尼亚政策论坛都强调,“ EHEA”是建立在欧洲共同原则的基础上,并基于不断发展的高等教育国际化”,“ HEIs欢迎有机会进行评估,认证或审计,他们多样化的活动并具有国际附加值”。 EHEA国家在促进高等教育质量保证(QA)方面的重点体现在体制建设以及与欧洲水平兼容的内容和实践的推广。质量保证跨国组织以及一些针对联合计划的项目也支持了计划国际化的需要。在这种情况下,本文件旨在以比较的方式介绍由罗马尼亚高等教育质量保证局(以下简称``罗马尼亚质量保证局'')对公共行政领域课程质量进行外部QA评估得出的模式和良好做法( ARACIS)和欧洲公共行政管理认证协会(EAPAA)在罗马尼亚布加勒斯特的国家政治学和公共管理学院攻读学士和硕士课程。总体研究框架将根据欧洲高等教育质量保证协会(ENQA)的优先事项来构建,并以ARACIS和EAPAA专家最近完成的自我评估报告和外部评估报告为基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号