首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Comparability of Test Results of Computer based Tests (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) among English Language Learners in Iran
【24h】

Comparability of Test Results of Computer based Tests (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) among English Language Learners in Iran

机译:伊朗英语学习者的计算机测试(CBT)和纸笔测试(PPT)的测试结果可比性

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aims at examining the score comparability of institutional multiple-choice reading comprehension tests in two testing methods, i.e. paper-based and computer-based tests taken by Iranian first-year English students in Azad University of Tehran, Iran. In order to find the results, the researcher required examining the impact of computer-based testing (henceforth CBT) on the test score results, and exploring the relationship between particular test takers’ characteristics such as prior computer familiarity and computer attitudes as well as test performancewith their test scores. Two equivalent tests were administered to participants on two different occasions. Utilizing matched t-test to compare the means of two test modes, the results of the study show the priority of PPT over CBT with .01 degree of difference at p<05. Using ANOVA, the findings revealed that computer familiarity and attitude towards computer had no significant influence on the students’ performance in computerized test. Additionally, participants showed more preference on test features presented on the computer test.
机译:这项研究旨在通过两种测试方法来检验机构多项选择阅读理解测试的得分可比性,即伊朗德黑兰Azad大学的伊朗一年级英语学生进行的纸质和计算机化测试。为了找到结果,研究人员需要检查基于计算机的测验(以下称为CBT)对测验成绩的影响,并探索特定应试者的特征(如先前的计算机熟悉度,计算机态度以及测验)之间的关系。他们的考试成绩表现。在两个不同的场合对参与者进行了两个等效的测试。利用匹配的t检验比较两种测试模式的均值,研究结果表明PPT优先于CBT,p <05时差异为0.01。使用方差分析,发现表明计算机的熟悉程度和对计算机的态度对学生在计算机化考试中的表现没有显着影响。此外,参与者对计算机测试中呈现的测试功能表现出更大的偏爱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号