...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Study on Chinese and European automotive R&D – comparison of low cost innovation versus system innovation
【24h】

Study on Chinese and European automotive R&D – comparison of low cost innovation versus system innovation

机译:中欧汽车研发研究-低成本创新与系统创新的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Chinese carmakers are leapfrogging innovation by levering electric vehicle propulsion technologies and providing low cost solutions. This has become a severe threat for mature global players. On the other hand, European premium carmakers have been able to increase their penetration in emerging markets. Even though premium cars yield higher costs of innovation and offer few possibilities to achieve scale effects, sales have skyrocketed to a record high in 2011. In both cases, manufacturers who can innovate best will emerge as winners in lucrative and expanding markets - regardless of origin or innovation approach. The aim of this paper is to outline disruptive innovation patterns of the Chinese automotive industry and to showcase the system integration capabilities of European carmakers. The paper commences with “the China Price” advantage that plays a vital role for Chinese carmakers to leapfrog technology gaps. It allows offering innovation at low cost. Also, the local electric vehicle supply chain, government supportiveness and behavior of emerging consumer groups drive growth for new technologies such as electric vehicles in China. Next, the European car industry is characterized with the evolution of key innovations coming to a large extend from German premium carmakers. Consequently, the paper shows how their global success and innovation dominance in the premium segment can be linked to their integrated R&D approach. This comprises system development, modularity concepts, in-house R&D value chain, rigorous planning processes and so forth. In summary, the paper analyses key trends in innovation patterns from the Chinese and European car industry. Furthermore, it shows related market drivers such as regulatory development and consumer behavior. At last, a generic model for new product development is used to compare automotive R&D approaches between China and Europe. The authors conclude with their findings on comparing low cost innovation versus system innovation based on Chinese and European automotive R&D.
机译:中国汽车制造商通过利用电动汽车推进技术和提供低成本解决方案,正在跨越式创新。对于成熟的全球参与者而言,这已成为严重威胁。另一方面,欧洲高端汽车制造商已经能够提高其在新兴市场的渗透率。尽管高档汽车产生了更高的创新成本,几乎没有实现规模效应的机会,但2011年的销售额却飙升至历史新高。在这两种情况下,创新能力最强的制造商将成为利润丰厚且不断扩展的市场的赢家-无论起源或创新方法。本文旨在概述中国汽车行业的颠覆性创新模式,并展示欧洲汽车制造商的系统集成能力。本文从“中国价格”优势入手,这对于中国汽车制造商跨越技术差距至关重要。它允许以低成本提供创新。此外,当地的电动汽车供应链,政府的支持和新兴消费群体的行为也推动了中国电动汽车等新技术的增长。其次,欧洲汽车工业的特点是德国高端汽车制造商在很大程度上扩展了关键创新。因此,本文显示了如何将其在高端市场的全球成功和创新优势与他们的综合研发方法联系起来。这包括系统开发,模块化概念,内部研发价值链,严格的计划流程等。总之,本文分析了中国和欧洲汽车行业创新模式的主要趋势。此外,它还显示了相关的市场驱动因素,例如法规制定和消费者行为。最后,使用新产品开发的通用模型来比较中国和欧洲之间的汽车研发方法。作者总结了基于中国和欧洲汽车研发的低成本创新与系统创新的比较结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号