...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Local relevancy evaluation in the accreditation bodies for engineering master?s programs
【24h】

Local relevancy evaluation in the accreditation bodies for engineering master?s programs

机译:工程硕士课程认可机构中的本地相关性评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Accreditation models in the international context mainly consider the evaluation of learning outcomes and the ability of programs (or higher education institutions) to achieve the educational objectives stated in their mission. However, it is not clear if these objectives and therefore their outcomes satisfy real national and regional needs, a critical point in engineering master's programs, especially in developing countries. The aim of this paper is to study the importance of the local relevancy evaluation of these programs and to analyze the main models of quality assurance and accreditation bodies of USA, Europe and Latin America, in order to ascertain whether the relevancy is evaluated or not. After a literature review, we found that in a free-market economic context and international education, the accreditation of master's programs follows an international accreditation model, and doesn?t take in account in most cases criteria and indicators for local relevancy. It concludes that it is necessary both, international accreditation to ensure the effectiveness of the program (achievement of learning outcomes) and the national accreditation through which it could ensure local relevancy of programs, for which we are giving some indicators.
机译:国际背景下的认证模型主要考虑对学习成果的评估以及计划(或高等教育机构)实现其使命中规定的教育目标的能力。但是,尚不清楚这些目标及其结果是否满足实际的国家和地区需求,这是工程学硕士课程的关键点,尤其是在发展中国家。本文的目的是研究对这些计划进行本地相关性评估的重要性,并分析美国,欧洲和拉丁美洲的质量保证和认证机构的主要模型,以确定是否对相关性进行了评估。经过文献综述后,我们发现在自由市场经济背景下和国际教育中,硕士课程的认证遵循国际认证模式,并且在大多数情况下并未考虑本地相关性的标准和指标。结论认为,既有国际认证以确保计划的有效性(实现学习成果),又有必要通过国家认证,以确保计划与当地的相关性,我们为此提供了一些指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号