首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Commentary: First-Order Embodiment, Second-Order Embodiment, Third-Order Embodiment
【24h】

Commentary: First-Order Embodiment, Second-Order Embodiment, Third-Order Embodiment

机译:评论:一阶实施例,二阶实施例,三阶实施例

获取原文
       

摘要

The framework of first-, second-, and third-order embodiment (1-3E; Metzinger, 2014) was developed for exploring how phenomenal properties are physically and computationally grounded. Metzinger's goal for 1-3E is to show how the experience of being a self (i.e., phenomenal selfhood) is generated within an embodied system and thus to embed his self-model theory (Metzinger, 2004) in the context of grounded cognition. The basic claim of his approach is that phenomenal selfhood (3E) is grounded in computational, representational processes (2E) that in turn are grounded in physical (i.e., neural and bodily) structures (1E). In what follows, I will discuss the aspects of grounding and representationality in the framework, and suggest clarifications.
机译:一阶,二阶和三阶实施例(1-3E; Metzinger,2014)的框架旨在探索物理和计算基础上的惊人特性是如何建立的。麦琴格针对1-3E的目标是展示如何在一个具体化的系统中产生自我的经验(即现象性自我),从而将他的自我模型理论(Metzinger,2004)嵌入到扎根的认知中。他的方法的基本主张是,惊人的自我(3E)建立在计算,表示过程(2E)的基础上,而计算过程又是建立在物理(即神经和身体)结构(1E)的基础上的。接下来,我将讨论框架中基础性和代表性的方面,并提出说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号