首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Avoiding the a??d??j??-variablea?? phenomenon: social psychology needs more guides to constructs
【24h】

Avoiding the a??d??j??-variablea?? phenomenon: social psychology needs more guides to constructs

机译:避免a ?? d ?? j ?? variablea ??现象:社会心理学需要更多指导来建构

获取原文
           

摘要

As a journal editor, I am frequently asked what constitutes an exceptional research article (Hagger, 2012). I usually respond by recommending Skinner's (1996) seminal guide to constructs of control as a prototypical example. When I was a doctoral student Skinner's article was extremely influential to my work. It not only helped me make sense of the myriad of constructs and terms used to describe and define the control construct, but also how I approached other constructs in social psychology. Skinner's guide was ahead of its time and her systematic approach to classifying and synthesizing constructs is supremely relevant today. Skinner identified the diversity in terminology, definition, and content of constructs related to control in social psychology, conducted an integrative review of theories incorporating control-related constructs, and developed a taxonomy and theoretical model to characterize them. Her guide was innovative for three reasons: (1) she recognized the richness in control-related constructs in social psychology but also the substantial redundancy and poor consensus; (2) she focused on systematically reducing redundancy and arriving at a core set of definitions and constructs; (3) she developed a theoretical basis for her integration. The proliferation of systematic reviews and syntheses in social psychology and other psychological disciplines illustrates that Skinner's guide was a precursor of things to come, but also illustrates that many syntheses of research findings are somewhat premature as they do not first systematically identify the commonalities and diversity in the constructs involved (Hagger and Chatzisarantis, 2009). I argue that social psychology needs more integrative frameworks like Skinner's to identify consistency in terminology, definition, and content of social psychological constructs. This will assist researchers to synthesize and integrate research findings and effects involving social psychological constructs.
机译:作为期刊编辑,我经常被问到什么是杰出的研究论文(Hagger,2012)。我通常会推荐Skinner(1996)的开创性指南来将控制结构作为一个典型的例子来回应。当我还是一名博士生时,Skinner的文章对我的工作影响很大。它不仅帮助我理解了用于描述和定义控制结构的无数种结构和术语,而且还帮助我了解了社会心理学中其他结构的方法。 Skinner的指南早于其时代,她对结构进行分类和合成的系统方法在今天尤为重要。斯金纳(Skinner)识别了与社会心理学中与控制有关的建构的术语,定义和内容上的多样性,对包含与控制有关的建构的理论进行了综合审查,并开发了分类学和理论模型来表征它们。她的指南具有创新性,其原因有以下三个:(1)她认识到社会心理学中与控制相关的构想的丰富性,但也认识到大量的冗余性和共识不足; (2)她致力于系统地减少冗余并得出一组核心定义和构造; (3)她为自己的整合发展提供了理论基础。社会心理学和其他心理学学科中系统的评论和综合方法的激增说明了斯金纳的指南是未来事物的先驱,但也说明了许多研究发现的综合方法还为时过早,因为它们没有首先系统地确定人类的共性和多样性。涉及的结构(Hagger和Chatzisarantis,2009)。我认为,社会心理学需要像Skinner这样的更完整的框架,以识别社会心理学结构的术语,定义和内容的一致性。这将有助于研究人员综合和整合涉及社会心理建构的研究结果和影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号