...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies
【24h】

Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies

机译:反思性学习工具中提示的效果:实验领域,实验室和在线研究的发现

获取原文
           

摘要

Reflective learning is an important type of learning both in formal and informal situations—in school, higher education, at the workplace, and in everyday life. People may benefit from technical support for reflective learning, in particular when supporting each other by reflecting not only upon their own but also upon other people’s problems. We refer to this collective approach where people come together to think about experiences and find solutions to problems as “collaborative reflection.” We present three empirical studies about the effects of prompting in reflective learning tools in such situations where people reflect on others’ issues. In Study 1 we applied a three-stage within-group design in a field experiment, where 39 participants from two organizations received different types of prompts while they used a reflection app. We found that prompts that invited employees to write down possible solutions led to more comprehensive comments on their colleagues’ experiences. In Study 2 we used a three-stage between-group design in a laboratory experiment, where 78 university students were invited to take part in an experiment about the discussion of problems at work or academic studies in online forums. Here we found that short, abstract prompts showed no superiority to a situation without any prompts with respect to quantity or quality of contributions. Finally, Study 3 featured a two-stage between-group design in an online experiment, where 60 participants received either general reflection instructions or detailed instructions about how to reflect on other people’s problems. We could show that detailed reflection instructions supported people in producing more comprehensive comments that included more general advice. The results demonstrate that to increase activity and to improve quality of comments with prompting tools require detailed instructions and specific wording of the prompts.
机译:反思性学习是在正式和非正式情况下(在学校,高等教育,工作场所和日常生活中)的重要学习类型。人们可能会从反思性学习的技术支持中受益,特别是在相互支持时,他们不仅会反思自己的问题,还会反思他人的问题。我们将这种集体方法称为“协作反思”,人们可以一起思考经验并找到解决问题的方法。我们提供了三项关于在个人思考他人问题的情况下反思性学习工具中提示的影响的实证研究。在研究1中,我们在现场实验中应用了三阶段小组内设计,其中两个组织的39名参与者在使用反射应用程序时收到了不同类型的提示。我们发现,邀请员工写下可能的解决方案的提示导致对同事的经历进行更全面的评论。在研究2中,我们在实验室实验中使用了三个阶段的小组间设计,邀请了78名大学生参加有关在线论坛上讨论工作或学术研究中的问题的实验。在这里,我们发现简短,抽象的提示在没有任何数量或质量提示的情况下对任何情况都没有优势。最后,研究3在一项在线实验中进行了两阶段的小组间设计,其中60名参与者获得了一般反思说明或关于如何思考他人问题的详细说明。我们可以证明,详细的反思说明可以帮助人们产生更全面的评论,包括更多的一般性建议。结果表明,使用提示工具来增加活动性和提高评论质量需要提示的详细说明和特定措辞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号