...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Commentary: The Cognitive Costs of Context: The Effects of Concreteness and Immersiveness in Instructional Examples
【24h】

Commentary: The Cognitive Costs of Context: The Effects of Concreteness and Immersiveness in Instructional Examples

机译:评论:语境的认知代价:教学实例中具体性和沉浸性的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

In their paper, Day et al. (2015) present a pair of studies exploring whether the concreteness of learned material and the context in which learning is embedded can influence retention. This builds on prior work assessing the influence of concrete examples during learning (Goldstone and Sakamoto, 2003). That work found that while concrete examples can facilitate immediate learning (Bransford and Johnson, 1972), it impedes the ability to transfer that knowledge to new situations, as is found in work on problem solving (Gick and Holyoak, 1983). This commentary highlights and extends three issues touched on and implicated by Day et al.'s paper, but which were not the central focus of that work. These are, namely, the importance of ecological validity, the transfer of learning to new domains, and the exploration of very long-term memories.
机译:Day等人的论文中。 (2015)提出了一对研究,探索学习材料的具体性和学习嵌入的环境是否会影响保留。这是建立在先前工作的基础上的,该工作评估了学习过程中具体例子的影响(Goldstone和Sakamoto,2003年)。这项工作发现,尽管具体的例子可以促进立即学习(Bransford和Johnson,1972),但它阻碍了将知识转移到新情况中的能力,这在解决问题的工作中是发现的(Gick and Holyoak,1983)。该评论强调并扩展了Day等人论文涉及和牵连的三个问题,但这不是该工作的重点。这些就是生态有效性的重要性,学习向新领域的转移以及对长期记忆的探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号