...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements
【24h】

New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements

机译:静态搜索任务和动态搜索任务之间策略差异的新证据:眼动的个人观察者分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Two experiments are reported that further explore the processes underlying dynamic search. In Experiment 1, observers’ oculomotor behavior was monitored while they searched for a randomly oriented T among oriented L distractors under static and dynamic viewing conditions. Despite similar search slopes, eye movements were less frequent and more spatially constrained under dynamic viewing relative to static, with misses also increasing more with target eccentricity in the dynamic condition. These patterns suggest that dynamic search involves a form of sit-and-wait strategy in which search is restricted to a small group of items surrounding fixation. To evaluate this interpretation, we developed a computational model of a sit-and-wait process hypothesized to underlie dynamic search. In Experiment 2 we tested this model by varying fixation position in the display and found that display positions optimized for a sit-and-wait strategy resulted in higher d′ values relative to a less optimal location. We conclude that different strategies, and therefore underlying processes, are used to search static and dynamic displays.
机译:据报道,有两个实验进一步探索了动态搜索的基础过程。在实验1中,当观察者在静态和动态观察条件下搜索定向L牵张器中的随机定向T时,对观察者的动眼行为进行了监测。尽管搜索斜率相似,但在动态观看条件下,相对于静态,在动态观看条件下,眼球运动的频率降低且受到更多的空间限制,而在动态条件下,目标偏心率也会使失误增加更多。这些模式表明,动态搜索涉及一种等待和等待策略,其中搜索仅限于围绕注视的一小部分项目。为了评估这种解释,我们开发了一个静坐等待过程的计算模型,该模型被认为是动态搜索的基础。在实验2中,我们通过改变显示器中的固定位置来测试此模型,发现针对坐等策略优化的显示器位置相对于次优位置而言导致较高的d'值。我们得出的结论是,可以使用不同的策略以及相应的基础过程来搜索静态和动态显示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号