...
首页> 外文期刊>Emerging Infectious Diseases >Comparing Diagnostic Coding and Laboratory Results
【24h】

Comparing Diagnostic Coding and Laboratory Results

机译:比较诊断编码和实验室结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To the Editor: The globalMilitary Health System maintainselectronic inpatient (StandardInpatient Data Record, SIDR) andoutpatient (Standard AmbulatoryData Record, SADR) clinical diag-nostic coded data generated by theDepartment of Defense CompositeHealth Care System (CHCS), an elec-tronic system that tracks and storesadministrative and other patientencounter data. Because theserecords are readily available, wide-spread monitoring of these data as ameans of medical surveillance hasbeen suggested (1,2). Only 1 study inthe literature assessed electronic cod-ing reliability of these data (3); thoseauthors found SIDRs to be a reliablesource of billing data for commondiagnoses, not including notifiableinfectious diseases. We comparedSADR and SIDR infectious diseasediagnostic codes to laboratory data toassess the usefulness of these datasetsin notifiable disease surveillance
机译:致编辑:全球军事卫生系统维护由美国国防部综合医疗保健系统(CHCS)生成的电子住院病人(StandardInpatient Data Record,SIDR)和门诊病人(Standard AmbulatoryData Record,SADR)临床诊断编码数据,该系统是一种电子系统,可以跟踪并存储管理和其他患者遭遇数据。由于这些记录很容易获得,因此建议将这些数据作为医学监测手段进行广泛监测(1,2)。文献中只有1项研究评估了这些数据的电子编码可靠性(3)。这些作者发现,SIDR是常见诊断计费数据的可靠来源,不包括可报告的传染病。我们将SADR和SIDR传染病诊断代码与实验室数据进行了比较,以评估这些数据集在应通报疾病监测中的有用性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号