首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >A randomized, double masked, controlled study of efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab versus bevacizumab in subjects with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. BRANVO Study.
【24h】

A randomized, double masked, controlled study of efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab versus bevacizumab in subjects with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. BRANVO Study.

机译:玻璃体腔内雷珠单抗与贝伐单抗治疗继发于视网膜分支静脉阻塞的黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性的随机,双掩蔽,对照研究。 BRANVO研究。

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab (BZB) compared to ranibizumab (RBZ) on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction of central retinal thickness (CRT) in subjects with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: This was a single center, non-inferiority trial (www.ctri.nic.in;REF/2012/01/003120) with equal allocation to groups. Seventy-five participants were randomized 1:1 using block randomization with a block size of 6 to receive either RZB or BZB. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) at 6 months, with a non-inferiority limit of 5 letters. The other outcomes were mean change in central retinal thickness (CRT) and safety. At each visit the participants received BCVA using ETDRS protocol, slit lamp biomicroscopy, intra ocular pressure measurement, indirect ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography. All participants received Intravitreal injection of the study drug at baseline and subsequently as per predefined criteria. Patients were evaluated monthly and macular laser was offered as per defined criteria after 3 months. Results: Participants were randomized to group A (RZB, n= 37) receiving and to group B (BZB, n=38). Mean age was 53 and 50 years in group A and B respectively. The mean BCVA at baseline was 52.81 ?± 14.41 letters in group A and 56.10 ?± 10.01 letters in group B. At end of 6 months the mean gain in VA was 18 letters (p0.0001; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 12.78 to 22.60) in ranibizumab group and 15 letters (p0.0001; 95% CI, 12.00 to 20.50) in bevacizumab group. The comparison between RZB and BZB was non inferior (RZB minus BZB: 3 letters, p=0.74; 95% CI, -4.99 to 7.99). The mean CRT at baseline was 441.34 ?± 116.52??m in group A and 493.85 ?± 162.98??m in group B. At the end of 6 months the mean CRT was 265.53 ?± 100.56??m in RZB group and 276.71 ?± 67.79??m in BZB group. Conclusions: Ranibizumab and bevacizumab had equivalent effects on visual acuity in patients with macular edema due to BRVO. But there was a trend towards greater benefit in RZB group.
机译:目的:评估玻璃体内贝伐单抗(BZB)与兰尼单抗(RBZ)相比在最佳视网膜矫正视力(BCVA)和视网膜中央视网膜厚度(CRT)降低对视网膜分支支静脉闭塞(BRVO)继发性黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性)。方法:这是一项单中心,非自卑性试验(www.ctri.nic.in; REF / 2012/01/003120),各组均等分配。使用块大小为6的块随机分配对75名参与者进行1:1随机分配,以接收RZB或BZB。主要结局是6个月时视敏度(VA)的平均变化,非劣效性限制为5个字母。其他结果是视网膜中央厚度(CRT)和安全性的平均变化。在每次访问中,参与者都使用ETDRS协议,裂隙灯生物显微镜,眼内压测量,间接检眼镜和光学相干断层扫描术获得BCVA。所有参与者在基线时以及随后按照预定标准接受玻璃体内注射研究药物。每月对患者进行评估,并在3个月后根据定义的标准提供黄斑激光。结果:参与者被随机分为A组(RZB,n = 37)和B组(BZB,n = 38)。 A组和B组的平均年龄分别为53岁和50岁。 A组基线平均BCVA为52.81±14.41个字母,B组基线为56.10±±10.01个字母。在6个月结束时,VA的平均增幅为18个字母(p <0.0001; 95%置信区间[CI],雷珠单抗组为12.78至22.60),贝伐单抗组为15个字母(p <0.0001; 95%CI,12.00至20.50)。 RZB与BZB之间的比较不差(RZB减去BZB:3个字母,p = 0.74; 95%CI,-4.99至7.99)。 A组基线平均CRT为441.34±±116.52Δm,B组基线为493.85±±162.98Δm。6个月结束时,RZB组CRT为265.53±±100.56Δm和276.71。 BZB组的±67.79Ω·m。结论:雷尼珠单抗和贝伐单抗对BRVO引起的黄斑水肿患者的视力具有同等作用。但是,RZB组中有一个朝着更大的利益发展的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号