首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Randomized controlled trial comparing ciprofloxacin and cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial comparing ciprofloxacin and cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies

机译:比较环丙沙星和头孢吡肟在发热性中性粒细胞减少症血液系统恶性肿瘤中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Ciprofloxacin (CPFX) is a potential alternative in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) because of its activity against Gram-negative organisms. We conducted a non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous CPFX and cefepime (CFPM) for FN patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: Patients aged from 15 to 79 years with an absolute neutrophil count of <0.500x10^9^/l were eligible, and were randomized to receive 300mg of CPFX or 2g of CFPM every 12h. Initial treatment efficacy, overall response, and early toxicity were evaluated. Results: Fifty-one episodes were included in this trial, and 49 episodes (CPFX vs. CFPM: 24 vs. 25) were evaluated. Treatment efficacy at day 7 was significantly higher in the CFPM group (successful clinical response: nine with CPFX and 19 with CFPM; p=0.007). The response was better in high-risk patients with neutrophil counts of @?0.100x10^9^/l (p=0.003). The overall response during the study period was similar between the CPFX and CFPM groups (p=0.64). Adverse events were minimal, and all patients could continue the treatment. Conclusions: We could not prove the non-inferiority of CPFX in comparison with CFPM for the initial treatment of FN. CFPM remains the standard treatment of choice for FN.
机译:背景:环丙沙星(CPFX)由于对革兰氏阴性菌具有活性,因此是发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)患者的潜在替代品。我们进行了一项非劣效,开放标签,随机对照试验,比较了静脉内CPFX和头孢吡肟(CFPM)对FN患有血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者。方法:年龄在15至79岁且中性粒细胞绝对计数<0.500x10 ^ 9 ^ / l的患者符合条件,并随机分配,每12h接受300mg CPFX或2g CFPM。评估了初始治疗效果,总体反应和早期毒性。结果:该试验包括51集,评估了49集(CPFX vs. CFPM:24 vs. 25)。 CFPM组在第7天的治疗效果显着更高(成功的临床反应:CPFX为9例,CFPM为19例; p = 0.007)。在嗜中性粒细胞计数为@?0.100x10 ^ 9 ^ / l的高危患者中,反应更好(p = 0.003)。在研究期间,CPFX和CFPM组的总体反应相似(p = 0.64)。不良事件极少,所有患者都可以继续治疗。结论:对于FN的初始治疗,我们不能证明CPFX与CFPM相比具有非劣效性。 CFPM仍然是FN选择的标准治疗方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号