...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Confirmational identification of Escherichia coli, a comparison of genotypic and phenotypic assays for glutamate decarboxylase and beta-D-glucuronidase.
【24h】

Confirmational identification of Escherichia coli, a comparison of genotypic and phenotypic assays for glutamate decarboxylase and beta-D-glucuronidase.

机译:确认性鉴定大肠杆菌,比较谷氨酸脱羧酶和β-D-葡萄糖醛酸酶的基因型和表型。

获取原文

摘要

Genotypic and phenotypic assays for glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) and beta-D-glucuronidase (GUD) were compared for their abilities to detect various strains of Escherichia coli and to discriminate among other bacterial species. Test strains included nonpathogenic E. coli, three major groups of diarrheagenic E. coli, three other non-coli Escherichia species, and various other gram-negative and -positive bacteria found in water. The genotypic assays were performed with hybridization probes generated by PCR amplification of 670- and 623-bp segments of the gadA/B (GAD) and uidA (GUD) genes, respectively. The GAD enzymes catalyze the alpha-decarboxylation of L-glutamic acid to yield gamma-aminobutyric acid and carbon dioxide, which are detected in the phenotypic assay by a pH-sensitive indicator dye. The phenotypic assay for GUD involves the transformation of 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide to the fluorogenic compound 4-methylumbelliferone. The GAD phenotypic assay detected the majority of the E. coli strains tested, whereas a number of these strains, including all representatives of the O157:H7 serotype and several nonpathogenic E. coli strains, gave negative results in the GUD assay. Both phenotypic assays detected some but not all strains from each of the four Shigella species. A strain of Citrobacter freundii was also detected by the GUD assay but not by the GAD assay. All E. coli and Shigella strains were detected with both the gadA/B and uidA probes. A few Escherichia fergusonii strains gave weak hybridization signals in response to both probes at 65 degrees C but not at 68 degrees C. None of the other bacterial species tested were detected by either probe. These results were consistent with previous reports which have indicated that the GAD phenotypic assay detects a wider range of E. coli strains than does the GUD assay and is also somewhat more specific for this species. The genotypic assays for the two enzymes were found to be equivalent in both of these respects and superior to both of the phenotypic assays in terms of the range of E. coli strains and isolates detected.
机译:比较了谷氨酸脱羧酶(GAD)和β-D-葡糖醛酸糖苷酶(GUD)的基因型和表型测定法检测各种大肠杆菌菌株以及区分其他细菌种类的能力。测试菌株包括非致病性大肠杆菌,腹泻性大肠杆菌三大类,其他三种非大肠杆菌大肠埃希氏菌以及水中发现的各种其他革兰氏阴性和阳性细菌。基因型分析是用杂交探针进行的,杂交探针分别通过PCR扩增gadA / B(GAD)和uidA(GUD)基因的670和623bp片段而产生。 GAD酶催化L-谷氨酸的α-脱羧反应,生成γ-氨基丁酸和二氧化碳,可通过pH敏感指示剂在表型分析中检测到。 GUD的表型分析涉及将4-甲基伞形酮基-β-D-葡萄糖醛酸转化为荧光化合物4-甲基伞形酮。 GAD表型测定法检测了大多数测试的大肠杆菌菌株,而其中许多菌株,包括O157:H7血清型的所有代表菌株和几种非致病性大肠杆菌菌株,在GUD测定法中均给出了阴性结果。两种表型测定法都检测到了四种志贺氏菌物种中的部分菌株,但并非全部。还通过GUD测定法检测到弗氏柠檬酸杆菌菌株,但未通过GAD测定法检测到。使用gadA / B和uidA探针均可检测到所有大肠杆菌和志贺氏菌菌株。在65摄氏度(而不是68摄氏度)下,一些弗氏埃希氏菌菌株对两种探针的杂交信号均较弱。两种探针均未检测到其他细菌。这些结果与以前的报告一致,后者表明GAD表型测定法比GUD测定法检测到的大肠杆菌菌株范围更广,并且对该物种也更具特异性。发现两种酶的基因型测定在这两个方面是相同的,并且就检测到的大肠杆菌菌株和分离物的范围而言,均优于两种表型测定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号