...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Multiple Reaction Monitoring with Multistage Fragmentation (MRM3) Detection Enhances Selectivity for LC-MS/MS Analysis of Plasma Free Metanephrines
【24h】

Multiple Reaction Monitoring with Multistage Fragmentation (MRM3) Detection Enhances Selectivity for LC-MS/MS Analysis of Plasma Free Metanephrines

机译:具有多阶段裂解(MRM3)检测功能的多反应监测可增强对血浆中无肾上腺素的LC-MS / MS分析的选择性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: LC-MS/MS with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) is a powerful tool for quantifying target analytes in complex matrices. However, the technique lacks selectivity when plasma free metanephrines are measured. We propose the use of multistage fragmentation (MRM3) to improve the analytical selectivity of plasma free metanephrine measurement.METHODS: Metanephrines were extracted from plasma with weak cation exchange solid-phase extraction before separation by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. We quantified normetanephrine and metanephrine by either MRM or MRM3 transitions m / z 166→134→79 and m / z 180→149→121, respectively.RESULTS: Over a 6-month period, approximately 1% (n = 21) of patient samples showed uncharacterized coeluting substances that interfered with the routine assay, resulting in an inability to report results. Quantification with MRM3 removed these interferences and enabled measurement of the target compounds. For patient samples unaffected by interferences, Deming regression analysis demonstrated a correlation between MRM3 and MRM methods of y = 1.00 x ? 0.00 nmol/L for normetanephrine and y = 0.99 x + 0.03 nmol/L for metanephrine. Between the MRM3 method and the median of all LC-MS/MS laboratories enrolled in a quality assurance program, the correlations were y = 0.97 x + 0.03 nmol/L for normetanephrine and y = 1.03 x ? 0.04 nmol/L for metanephrine. Imprecision for the MRM3 method was 6.2%–7.0% for normetanephrine and 6.1%–9.9% for metanephrine (n = 10). The lower limits of quantification for the MRM3 method were 0.20 nmol/L for normetanephrine and 0.16 nmol/L for metanephrine.CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRM3 technology improves the analytical selectivity of plasma free metanephrine quantification by LC-MS/MS while demonstrating sufficient analytical sensitivity and imprecision.
机译:背景:具有多反应监测(MRM)的LC-MS / MS是用于定量分析复杂基质中目标分析物的强大工具。但是,该技术在测定无血浆肾上腺素时缺乏选择性。我们建议使用多级裂解法(MRM3)来提高血浆中无去甲肾上腺素测定的分析选择性。方法:用弱阳离子交换固相萃取从血浆中提取去甲肾上腺素,然后通过亲水作用液相色谱分离。我们分别通过MRM或MRM3转换m / z 166→134→79和m / z 180→149→121来量化去甲肾上腺素和间肾上腺素的结果。在6个月的时间里,约1%(n = 21)的患者样品显示出未表征的共洗脱物质,干扰了常规测定,导致无法报告结果。用MRM3进行的定量分析消除了这些干扰,并能够测量目标化合物。对于不受干扰影响的患者样本,戴明回归分析表明,MRM3和MRM方法之间的相关性为y = 1.00 x?对于去甲肾上腺素为0.00 nmol / L,对于去甲肾上腺素,y = 0.99 x + 0.03 nmol / L。在MRM3方法和所有参加质量保证程序的LC-MS / MS实验室的中位数之间,去甲肾上腺素的相关系数为y = 0.97 x + 0.03 nmol / L,y = 1.03 x?肾上腺素0.04 nmol / L。对于去甲肾上腺素,MRM3方法的不准确度为6.2%–7.0%,对于甲肾上腺素,其不准确度为6.1%–9.9%(n = 10)。 MRM3方法的最低定量限为去甲肾上腺素为0.20 nmol / L,间肾上腺素为0.16 nmol / L。敏感性和不精确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号