首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Cancer >Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent
【24h】

Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent

机译:是否有顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌的案例?含顺铂方案与不含该烷化剂方案的随机试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Chemotherapy is the backbone of small-cell lung cancer therapy. However, optimal drug combinations and schedules remain to be defined and there is hitherto no world-wide accepted standard regimen. Cisplatin, an alkylating agent with high putative toxicity is currently widely used although its effectiveness in this disease has not been established firmly. We conducted a meta-analysis of published data reporting trials randomizing a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent in order to determine possible differences in survival response and toxicity. Nineteen trials have been identified in medical literature (4054 evaluable patients). Ten trials randomized patients to receive a cisplatin-etoposide regimen versus a regimen without any of these two drugs. A subgroup analysis was, therefore, carried out in the nine remaining trials that randomly allocated patients between two regimens differing in the absence or presence of cisplatin, whereas etoposide was given (or not given) in both arms (1579 evaluable patients). The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to estimate the size effects and the Peto and Yusuf method was used in order to generate the odds ratios (OR) of reduction in risk of death and the increase in probability of being responders to chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between the cisplatin-containing regimen and the regimen without this drug when the risk of toxic-death was taken into account with respective probabilities of 3.1 and 2.7% (NS). Patients randomized in a cisplatin-containing regimen had an increase in probability of being responders with an OR of 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.18–1.55;P –5 corresponding to an increase of objective (partial plus complete) response rate from 0.62 to 0.69 (a result taking into account a significant heterogeneity). Patients treated with a cisplatin-containing regimen benefited from a significant reduction of risk of death at 6 months and 1 year with respective OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75–0.98, P = 0.03, and or 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.93, P = 0.002 (no statistical heterogeneity). This corresponded to a significant increase in the probability of survival of 2.6% and 4.4% at 6 months and 1 year respectively. The meta-analysis restricted to the subset of nine trials without etoposide treatment imbalance reached similar conclusions. A cisplatin-containing regimen yields a higher response rate and probability of survival than does a chemotherapy containing others alkylating agents without a perceptible increase in risk of toxic-death. ? 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
机译:化学疗法是小细胞肺癌疗法的基础。然而,最佳药物组合和时间表尚待确定,并且迄今为止还没有全球公认的标准方案。顺铂是一种具有高推定毒性的烷基化剂,目前尚未得到广泛应用,尽管它在该疾病中的有效性尚无定论。我们对已发表的数据报告试验进行了荟萃分析,对含顺铂方案和不含这种烷化剂的方案进行随机分组,以确定生存反应和毒性的可能差异。医学文献中已经鉴定出19项试验(4054名可评估患者)。十项试验将患者随机分配接受顺铂-依托泊苷方案与不使用这两种药物中的任何一种方案。因此,在其余的9个试验中进行了亚组分析,该试验将患者随机分配到两种方案中,两种方案因不存在或不存在顺铂而有所不同,而两组均给予(或不给予)依托泊苷(1579名可评估患者)。 DerSimonian和Laird方法用于估计尺寸效应,Peto和Yusuf方法用于产生死亡风险降低和对化学疗法有反应的可能性增加的比值比(OR)。当考虑到分别有3.1和2.7%(NS)的可能性时的毒性死亡风险时,含顺铂方案与不使用该药的方案之间没有显着差异。随机接受含顺铂方案的患者,其响应者的可能性增加,OR为1.35,95%置信区间(CI)为1.18–1.55; P –5对应于客观(部分加完全)反应的增加比率从0.62到0.69(考虑到显着的异质性)。采用含顺铂方案的患者在6个月和1年时死亡风险显着降低,分别为OR 0.87、95%CI 0.75-0.98,P = 0.03和或0.80、95%CI 0.69-。 0.93,P = 0.002(无统计异质性)。这对应于分别在6个月和1年时生存率分别为2.6%和4.4%的显着增加。荟萃分析仅限于9个试验的子集,而没有依托泊苷治疗失衡,得出相似的结论。含顺铂的方案比含其他烷基化剂的化疗方案有更高的应答率和生存率,而毒性死亡的风险却没有明显增加。 ? 2000年癌症研究运动

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号