...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical oncology >Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen versus cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen versus cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:基于奥沙利铂的方案与顺铂的治疗方法在胃癌治疗中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundCisplatin played an important role in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Oxaliplatin has been shown to be at least as effective as cisplatin for GC, with less toxicity and a better tolerability profile. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen versus cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of GC.MethodsDatabases of CNKI, CBM, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library were searched for eligible literatures from their establishments to November 2018. Randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimen with that of cisplatin-based regimen in the treatment of GC were included. Statistical analyses were calculated using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSeven randomized controlled trials including 2297 patients were included. Compared with cisplatin-based regimen intervention in GC, oxaliplatin-based regimen treatment was able to significantly improve the partial response rate (OR=1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; p=0.007), disease progression rate (OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.66; p=0.0002) and 1-year survival (OR=1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.56; p=0.05). The toxicities of hematopoietic system were significantly higher in cisplatin-based regimen group (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.46-0.79; p=0.0002), while oxaliplatin-based regimen group had higher neurosensory toxicity (OR=2.21, 95% CI 1.52-3.21; p<0.0001), In addition, gastrointestinal toxicity was similar between the two groups (OR=1.01, 95% CI 0.5-2.01; p=0.27).ConclusionsCompared with cisplatin-based regimen, oxaliplatin-based regimen treatment has an obvious advantage in patients with GC with acceptable tolerance.
机译:Backgroundcisplatin在治疗胃癌(GC)中起着重要作用。已显示奥沙利铂至少与GC的顺铂一样有效,毒性较小和更好的耐受性曲线。我们进行了荟萃分析以比较基于奥沙利铂的方案与顺铂的治疗方法的疗效和安全性在寻找符合条件的文献中的CNKI,CBM,VIP,Wanfang,PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆。将其达到2018年11月的遗址。随机对照试验,将基于奥沙利铂的方案与基于顺铂的方案的治疗方法进行了比较的疗效和安全性。使用Revman 5.3软件计算统计分析。包括2297名患者的可随机对照试验。与GC中基于顺铂的方案干预相比,基于奥沙利铂的方案治疗能够显着提高部分响应率(或= 1.26,95%CI 1.07-1.49; P = 0.007),疾病进展率(或= 0.41,95 %CI 0.25-0.66; p = 0.0002)和1年存活(或= 1.25,95%CI 1.00-1.56; P = 0.05)。基于顺铂的方案组(OR = 0.6,95%CI 0.46-0.79; P = 0.0002),造血系统的毒性显着较高(或= 0.6,95%),而基于奥沙利铂的方案组具有较高的神经感觉毒性(或= 2.21,95%CI 1.52 -3.21; P <0.0001),两组(或= 1.01,95%CI 0.5-2.01; P = 0.27)之间的胃肠道毒性相似。与基于顺铂的方案的结合,基于奥沙利铂的方案治疗方法有一个GC具有可接受耐受性患者的明显优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号