...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Associations of mutually exclusive categories of physical activity and sedentary time with markers of cardiometabolic health in English adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Health Survey for England
【24h】

Associations of mutually exclusive categories of physical activity and sedentary time with markers of cardiometabolic health in English adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Health Survey for England

机译:身体活动和久坐时间的互斥类别与英国成年人心脏代谢健康的标志的关联:英国健康调查的横断面分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Both physical activity and sedentary behaviour have been individually associated with health, however, the extent to which the combination of these behaviours influence health is less well-known. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of four mutually exclusive categories of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time on markers of cardiometabolic health in a nationally representative sample of English adults. Using the 2008 Health Survey for England dataset, 2131 participants aged ≥18?years, who provided valid accelerometry data, were included for analysis and grouped into one of four behavioural categories: (1) ‘Busy Bees’: physically active & low sedentary, (2) ‘Sedentary Exercisers’: physically active & high sedentary, (3) ‘Light Movers’: physically inactive & low sedentary, and (4) ‘Couch Potatoes’: physically inactive & high sedentary. ‘Physically active’ was defined as accumulating at least 150?min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week. ‘Low sedentary’ was defined as residing in the lowest quartile of the ratio between the average sedentary time and the average light-intensity physical activity time. Weighted multiple linear regression models, adjusting for measured confounders, investigated the differences in markers of health across the derived behavioural categories. The associations between continuous measures of physical activity and sedentary levels with markers of health were also explored, as well as a number of sensitivity analyses. In comparison to ‘Couch Potatoes’, ‘Busy Bees’ [body mass index: ?1.67?kg/m2 (p?
机译:体育活动和久坐的行为都与健康相关,但是,这些行为的组合对健康的影响程度尚不为人所知。这项研究的目的是检查在英国成年人中有代表性的四个相互排斥类别的客观测量的身体活动和久坐时间与心脏代谢健康指标的关联。使用2008年英国健康调查数据集,对2131名年龄≥18岁的参与者提供了有效的加速度计数据进行了分析,并将其分为以下四种行为类别之一:(1)“忙碌的蜜蜂”:身体活跃且久坐不动, (2)“久坐锻炼者”:身体活动且久坐不动;(3)“轻行者”:身体不活跃且久坐不动;(4)“沙发土豆”:身体不活跃且久坐不动。 “体育锻炼”的定义是每周累积至少150分钟的中度到剧烈的体育锻炼(MVPA)。 “久坐不动”定义为平均久坐时间与平均光强度身体活动时间之比的最低四分位数。加权多元线性回归模型(针对测量的混杂因素进行了调整)调查了在衍生行为类别中健康指标的差异。还探讨了持续进行的体育锻炼与久坐不动与健康指标之间的关系,以及许多敏感性分析。与“沙发土豆”相比,“忙碌的蜜蜂” [体重指数:?1.67?kg / m2(p?<?0.001);腰围:1.17cm(p = 0.007)。糖化血红蛋白:≤0.12%(p≤0.003); HDL-胆固醇:0.09?mmol / L(p?=?0.001)],“久坐运动者” [体重指数:?1.64?kg / m2(p?<?0.001);糖化血红蛋白:≤0.11%(p≤0.009); HDL胆固醇:0.07?mmol / L(p?<?0.001)]和“轻巧的运动者” [HDL-胆固醇:0.11?mmol / L(p?= 0.004)]具有更有利的健康指标。连续分析显示与分类分析一致,敏感性分析显示稳健性和稳定性。在这个英国成年人的全国样本中,即使在那些久坐时间较长的人中,进行体育锻炼也可以改善健康状况。与运动无关的久坐时间与HDL-胆固醇呈正相关。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号