首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >4: A STUDY ON THE RATE OF INFORMATION LITERACY OF FACULTY MEMBERS AND PHD STUDENTS OF FACULTY OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY, TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, BASED ON SUCCESSFUL EVIDENCE HEALTHCARE
【24h】

4: A STUDY ON THE RATE OF INFORMATION LITERACY OF FACULTY MEMBERS AND PHD STUDENTS OF FACULTY OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY, TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, BASED ON SUCCESSFUL EVIDENCE HEALTHCARE

机译:4:基于成功的循证医学,基于塔布里兹医科大学护理和助产科的院系成员和PHD学生的信息素养率研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background and aims: Evidence based care is an approach to clinical problem-solving in which merging the results of several studies and information on specialty clinical care as well as patients' wishes and values leads to effective decision making, to avoid seeking frequent care facilitating the patient cares, empowering healthcare workers, maintaining and improving the health of patients and the families. Results of the conducted studies suggest that using such an approach requires information literacy skills. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess information literacy of the faculty members and PhD students of Nursing and Midwifery School of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences about evidence based care. Methods: In this cross-sectional survey 53 PhD students and faculty members were selected using census sampling method. Data gathering tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. This inventory was developed regarding valid scientific literature on information literacy and evidence-based care with 68 items and 5 standards of literacy prepared within some steps. After confirming the validity, its reliability was concluded by Cranach's Alpha (0.89). Data was analyzed using SPSS/22. Results: Average information literacy skill level for faculty members and students related to evidence-based care and information literacy standards was higher than the average index, except for ?¢????information exchange?¢???? standard (50???±10). The highest and lowest mean scores in evidence based care were for, respectively, questions formation (respectively, 96.18???±18.6.17 and 48.51???±14.69) and evaluation results (respectively 95.56???±6.66 and 45.94???±14.08). For information literacy standards there were calculated for (respectively) finding information as the highest score for (respectively, 95.56???±6.66 and 72.44???±13.62) and the lowest for information exchange (respectively, 74.19???±11.83 and 48.51???±11.35). Conclusion: According to the results of this study and also regarding to this subject that PhD students' and faculty members' information literacy level was above the average; it is recommended to develop optimal measures to promote evidence based decision making.
机译:摘要背景与目的:循证护理是一种解决临床问题的方法,该方法将多项有关临床专业护理的研究和信息以及患者的意愿和价值观相结合,从而做出有效的决策,从而避免寻求经常性护理患者护理,增强医护人员能力,维护和改善患者及其家庭的健康。进行的研究结果表明,使用这种方法需要信息素养技能。因此,本研究旨在评估大不里士医科大学护理和助产学学院的教师和博士生有关循证护理的信息素养。方法:在这项横断面调查中,使用普查抽样方法选择了53名博士生和教职员工。数据收集工具是研究人员制作的问卷。该清单是根据有关信息素养和循证护理的有效科学文献而开发的,在一些步骤中准备了68项内容和5个素养标准。在确认有效性之后,其可靠性由Cranach的Alpha(0.89)得出结论。使用SPSS / 22分析数据。结果:与“循证护理和信息素养标准”相关的教职员工和学生的平均信息素养技能水平高于平均指数,但“信息交流”和“信息交流”除外。标准(50±10)。循证护理的最高和最低平均得分分别是问题形成(分别为96.18±18.6.17和48.51±14.69)和评估结果(分别为95.56±6.66和45.94)。 ??±14.08)。对于信息素养标准,计算(分别)发现信息的最高得分(分别为95.56±6.66和72.44±13.62),最低信息交换(74.19±11.83)。和48.51 ???±11.35)。结论:根据本研究的结果,并就该主题而言,博士生和教职工的信息素养水平高于平均水平;建议制定最佳措施以促进基于证据的决策。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BMJ Open》 |2017年第1期|共页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号