...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >036: DOES HEALTH INSURANCE PROMOTE HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND PROVIDE FINANCIAL PROTECTION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES FROM INDIA
【24h】

036: DOES HEALTH INSURANCE PROMOTE HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND PROVIDE FINANCIAL PROTECTION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES FROM INDIA

机译:036:医疗保险会促进医疗保健的获取并提供财务保护:来自印度的经验证据

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Promoting healthcare access and reducing out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure is an important health policy goal in a developing country including India. How far health insurance interventions have helped in achieving these objectives is examined in the present study. Objectives This paper examines the impact of health insurance in promoting access to healthcare use and providing financial risk protection during health emergency. This also evaluates the relative role of publically financed pro-poor health insurance-PFPHI (like, the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana-RSBY and state run health insurance scheme) schemes, employer insurers and private insurance companies in providing financial protection to meet health expenses. Methods This study has explored data at the household?s level from two National Sample Survey (60th: 2004?¢????05 and 68th: 2011?¢????12) rounds, provided by Government of India. The two-sample t-test, concentration curve and multivatiate regression analysis is used. Result We found that health insurance promotes access to healthcare use for inpatient cares and promote equity. The impact of health insurance in promoting healthcare use remained noticeable high among poorest, as the inpatient rates of poor insured persons found about 16.4% higher than poor uninsured persons. However, it appears that health insurance encourages people to switch to costlier/tertiary cares and sidetracking primary care providers and leading to demand-supply induce moral hazard problems. This in turn increases the cost per inpatient episode of care. Health insurances financial protection remained highly biased towards rich and urban, while limited to poor and rural residents. The publically financed pro-poor health insurance strategies turned effective in promoting healthcare access/use, in area where provider networks are fairly extensive spreading across regions, in failure, their likely impacts found to be low. The role of private insurers (with the increase in FDI caps in health insurance from 26% to 29%) however expected to grow in India but financial protection provided by them are found one of the lowest. The average amount of premium collected by them is one of the highest but reimbursement made is very low. Conclusion Findings suggest India needs to adopt both health insurance and tax-financing strategies with appropriate regulation of private providers and insurers markets.
机译:摘要背景:在包括印度在内的发展中国家,促进医疗保健普及和减少自付费用是一项重要的卫生政策目标。本研究探讨了健康保险干预措施在多大程度上有助于实现这些目标。目标本文研究了健康保险在促进医疗紧急状况期间促进获得医疗保健使用和提供财务风险保护方面的影响。这也评估了公共资助的扶贫健康保险-PFPHI(如Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana-RSBY和国有健康保险计划)计划,雇主保险公司和私人保险公司在提供财务保护以支付健康费用方面的相对作用。方法本研究从印度政府提供的两次全国抽样调查(第60届:2004年–05年; 05届和68届:2011年–12年)中探索了家庭水平的数据。使用两样本t检验,浓度曲线和多元回归分析。结果我们发现,健康保险促进了住院治疗的医疗保健使用并促进了公平。在最贫穷的人群中,健康保险对促进医疗保健使用的影响仍然显着,因为贫穷的被保险人的住院率比贫穷的未被保险的人高约16.4%。但是,健康保险似乎鼓励人们转向更昂贵的/三级护理并回避初级护理提供者,并导致需求供应引发道德风险问题。这反过来增加了每次住院治疗的费用。健康保险的财务保护仍然高度偏重于富人和城市,而仅限于穷人和农村居民。由公共资助的扶贫健康保险战略在促进医疗保健的获取/使用方面变得有效,因为在提供者网络分布在各个地区的区域相当广泛的地区,失败时,其潜在影响很小。私营保险公司的作用(健康保险中的外国直接投资上限从26%增至29%)预计在印度会增长,但发现它们提供的财务保护是最低的。他们收取的平均保费数额是最高的之一,但偿还额却很低。结论结论表明,印度需要在适当监管私人提供者和保险公司市场的同时,采取健康保险和税收筹资战略。

著录项

  • 来源
    《BMJ Open》 |2015年第1期|共页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号