...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >How do we deal with multiple goals for care within an individual patient trajectory? A document content analysis of health service research papers on goals for care
【24h】

How do we deal with multiple goals for care within an individual patient trajectory? A document content analysis of health service research papers on goals for care

机译:在单个患者轨迹内,我们如何处理多个护理目标?有关保健目标的卫生服务研究论文的文件内容分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives Patients with complex long-term needs experience multiple parallel care processes, which may have conflicting or competing goals, within their individual patient trajectory (iPT). The alignment of multiple goals is often implicit or non-existent, and has received little attention in the literature. Research questions: (1) What goals for care relevant for the iPT can be identified from the literature? (2) What goal typology can be proposed based on goal characteristics? (3) How can professionals negotiate a consistent set of goals for the iPT? Design Document content analysis of health service research papers, on the topic of ‘goals for care’. Setting With the increasing prevalence of multimorbidity, guidance regarding the identification and alignment of goals for care across organisations and disciplines is urgently needed. Participants 70 papers that describe ‘goals for care’, ‘health’ or ‘the good healthcare process’ relevant to a general iPT, identified in a step-wise structured search of MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Results We developed a goal typology with four categories. Three categories are professionally defined: (1) Functional, (2) Biological/Disease and (3) Adaptive goals. The fourth category is the patient's personally defined goals. Professional and personal goals may conflict, in which case goal prioritisation by creation of a goal hierarchy can be useful. We argue that the patient has the moral and legal right to determine the goals at the top of such a goal hierarchy. Professionals can then translate personal goals into realistic professional goals such as standardised health outcomes linked to evidence-based guidelines. Thereby, when goals are aligned with one another, the iPT will be truly patient centred, while care follows professional guidelines. Conclusions Personal goals direct professional goals and define the success criteria of the iPT. However, making personal goals count requires brave and wide-sweeping attitudinal, organisational and regulatory transformation of care delivery.
机译:目标长期需求复杂的患者在其各自的患者轨迹(iPT)内经历了多个并行的护理过程,这些过程可能有相互冲突或相互竞争的目标。多个目标的一致性通常是隐含的或不存在的,并且在文献中很少受到关注。研究问题:(1)从文献中可以确定哪些与iPT相关的护理目标? (2)根据目标特征可以提出什么样的目标类型? (3)专业人士如何为iPT协商一套一致的目标?以“护理目标”为主题的卫生服务研究论文的设计文件内容分析。背景随着多发病率的日益上升,迫切需要有关在组织和学科之间确定和调整医疗目标的指南。参与者有70篇论文描述了与一般iPT相关的“护理目标”,“健康”或“良好医疗保健过程”,这些内容是在MEDLINE,Web of Science和Google Scholar的逐步结构化搜索中找到的。结果我们开发了一种具有四个类别的目标类型。专业定义了三个类别:(1)功能,(2)生物/疾病和(3)适应性目标。第四类是患者的个人定义目标。专业目标和个人目标可能会发生冲突,在这种情况下,通过创建目标层次结构确定目标优先级可能会很有用。我们认为,患者具有在此类目标层次结构顶部确定目标的精神和法律权利。然后,专业人员可以将个人目标转化为现实的职业目标,例如与基于证据的准则相关的标准化健康结果。因此,当目标相互一致时,iPT将真正以患者为中心,而护理则遵循专业准则。结论个人目标指导职业目标并确定iPT的成功标准。但是,要实现个人目标,就需要勇敢而广泛地改变医疗服务的态度,组织和法规。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号