...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline

机译:系统评价和荟萃分析,评估麦角戈林的不良事件特征和耐受性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To evaluate the safety profile of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents from published randomised controlled trials. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of nicergoline compared with placebo and other active agents across various indications. Data sources MEDLINE, Medline-in-process, Cochrane, EMBASE, EMBASE alerts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Cochrane Methodology Register (CMR) for all the randomised controlled trials, open-label or blinded, in adults treated with nicergoline. Studies published until August 2013 were included. Review method 29 studies were included for data extraction. The studies included in this review were majorly from European countries and mostly in cerebrovascular disease (n=15) and dementia (n=8). Results The treatment withdrawals were comparatively lower in the nicergoline group as compared with the placebo group (RR=0.92; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.21) and other active comparators (RR=0.45; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.95), but the difference was non-significant. Incidence of any adverse events (AEs) was slightly higher (RR=1.05; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.2) while incidence of serious AEs was lower (RR=0.85; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.45) in the nicergoline compared with placebo group. Frequency of anxiety was significantly lower in nicergoline as compared with placebo (p=0.01). Other AEs including diarrhoea, gastric upset, dizziness and drowsiness were less frequent in the nicergoline group when compared with placebo/active drugs, but the difference was non-significant. Frequency of hypotension and hot flushes was slightly higher in the nicergoline group but the difference was non-significant. None of the studies reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline treatment. Conclusions Nicergoline is an ergot derivative, but its safety profile is better than other ergot derivatives like ergotamine and ergotoxine. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that nicergoline has a good safety profile. None of the studies included in this systematic review reported any incidence of fibrosis or ergotism with nicergoline.
机译:目的评价尼麦角林与安慰剂和其他已发表的随机对照试验中的其他活性剂相比的安全性。设计尼麦角林与安慰剂和其他活性剂在各种适应症中的系统评价和荟萃分析。数据源MEDLINE,过程中的Medline,Cochrane,EMBASE,EMBASE警报,Cochrane对照试验中央注册系统(CENTRAL),Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)和所有随机对照试验的Cochrane方法注册系统(CMR)已开放尼麦角林治疗的成年人中,其标签或致盲。纳入截至2013年8月的研究。审查方法包括29项研究以提取数据。该评价中包括的研究主要来自欧洲国家,主要涉及脑血管疾病(n = 15)和痴呆症(n = 8)。结果尼麦角林组与安慰剂组(RR = 0.92; 95%CI 0.7至1.21)和其他活性比较药物(RR = 0.45; 95%CI 0.10至1.95)相比,治疗停药率相对较低。不重要的。与安慰剂组相比,尼麦角林中任何不良事件(AEs)的发生率略高(RR = 1.05; 95%CI 0.93至1.2),而严重AEs的发生率较低(RR = 0.85; 95%CI 0.50至1.45)。与安慰剂相比,尼麦角林的焦虑发生率显着降低(p = 0.01)。尼麦角林组与安慰剂/活性药物相比,其他不良事件包括腹泻,胃部不适,头晕和嗜睡的发生率较低,但差异无统计学意义。美麦角林组低血压和潮热的频率稍高,但差异无统计学意义。没有研究报道尼麦角林治疗有任何纤维化或麦角炎的发生。结论尼麦角林是一种麦角衍生物,但其安全性优于其他麦角衍生物,如麦角胺和麦角毒素。这项系统的审查和荟萃分析表明,尼麦角林具有良好的安全性。该系统评价中未涉及任何研究报告麦角甲林有任何纤维化或麦角炎发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号