首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Telephone Versus Internet Administration of Self-Report Measures of Social Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Insomnia: Psychometric Evaluation of a Method to Reduce the Impact of Missing Data
【24h】

Telephone Versus Internet Administration of Self-Report Measures of Social Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Insomnia: Psychometric Evaluation of a Method to Reduce the Impact of Missing Data

机译:电话与互联网管理有关社交焦虑,抑郁症状和失眠的自我报告测评方法的对比:心理测量法评估减少丢失数据影响的方法

获取原文

摘要

Background: Internet-administered self-report measures of social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep difficulties are widely used in clinical trials and in clinical routine care, but data loss is a common problem that could render skewed estimates of symptom levels and treatment effects. One way of reducing the negative impact of missing data could be to use telephone administration of self-report measures as a means to complete the data missing from the online data collection.Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the convergence of telephone and Internet administration of self-report measures of social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep difficulties.Methods: The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR), Montgomery-?sberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-Rated (MADRS-S), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were administered over the telephone and via the Internet to a clinical sample (N=82) of psychiatric patients at a clinic specializing in Internet-delivered treatment. Shortened versions of the LSAS-SR and the ISI were used when administered via telephone.Results: As predicted, the results showed that the estimates produced by the two administration formats were highly correlated (r=.82-.91; P<.001) and internal consistencies were high in both administration formats (telephone: Cronbach alpha=.76-.86 and Internet: Cronbach alpha=.79-.93). The correlation coefficients were similar across questionnaires and the shorter versions of the questionnaires used in the telephone administration of the LSAS-SR and ISI performed in general equally well compared to when the full scale was used, as was the case with the MADRS-S.Conclusions: Telephone administration of self-report questionnaires is a valid method that can be used to reduce data loss in routine psychiatric practice as well as in clinical trials, thereby contributing to more accurate symptom estimates.
机译:背景:互联网上对社交焦虑,抑郁症状和睡眠困难的自我报告测量已广泛用于临床试验和临床常规护理中,但是数据丢失是一个常见问题,可能导致对症状水平和治疗效果的估计偏高。减少丢失数据的负面影响的一种方法是使用电话管理的自我报告措施,作为完成在线数据收集中丢失数据的一种方法。目的:研究的目的是比较电话和电话的收敛性。互联网管理的社交焦虑,抑郁症状和睡眠障碍自我报告测量方法。方法:利勃维茨社交焦虑量表-自我报告(LSAS-SR),蒙哥马利-sberg抑郁量表-自定等级(MADRS-S ),并通过电话和互联网将失眠严重度指数(ISI)应用于精神病患者的临床样本(N = 82),该样本来自专门从事互联网治疗的诊所。通过电话进行管理时,使用LSAS-SR和ISI的缩短版本。结果:如预期的那样,结果表明,两种管理形式产生的估计值高度相关(r = .82-.91; P <.001) )和两种管理格式的内部一致性都很高(电话:Cronbach alpha = .76-.86和Internet:Cronbach alpha = .79-.93)。各问卷之间的相关系数相似,与使用满刻度时相比,在LSAS-SR和ISI的电话管理中使用的较短版本的问卷通常与使用MADRS-S时表现相同。结论:自我报告调查表的电话管理是一种有效的方法,可用于减少常规精神病学实践以及临床试验中的数据丢失,从而有助于更准确的症状估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号