...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Trauma Management and Outcomes >PHTLS ? (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) provider courses in Germany – who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training?
【24h】

PHTLS ? (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) provider courses in Germany – who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training?

机译:PHTLS?在德国(院前创伤生命支持)提供者课程–谁参加,参与者对院前创伤护理培训有何看法?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The goal of this study was to examine PHTLS Provider courses in Germany and to proof the assumption that formation of physicians and paramedics in prehospital trauma care can be optimized. Methods PHTLS participants were asked to fill out standardized questionnaires during their course preparation and directly after the course. There were some open questions regarding their professional background and closed questions concerning PHTLS itself. Further questions were to be answered on an analog scale in order to quantify subjective impressions of confidence, knowledge and also to describe individual levels of education and training. Results 247 questionnaires could be analyzed. Physicians noted significant (p < 0.001) more deficits in their professional training than paramedics. 80% of the paramedics affirmed to have had adequate training with respect to prehospital trauma care, all physicians claimed not to have had sufficient training for prehospital trauma care situations at Medical School. Physicians were statistically most significant dissatisfied then paramedics (p < 0.001). While most participants gave positive feedback, anesthetists were less convinced of PHTLS (p = 0.005), didn’t benefit as much as the rest (p = 0.004) and stated more often, that the course was of less value for their daily work (p = 0.03). After the course confidence increased remarkably and reached higher rates than before the course (p < 0.001). After PHTLS both groups showed similar ratings concerning the course concept indicating that PHTLS could equalize some training deficits and help to gain confidence and assurance in prehospital trauma situations. 90% of the paramedics and 100% of the physicians would recommend PHTLS. Physicians and especially anesthetists revised their opinions with regard to providing PHTLS at Medical School after having taken part in a PHTLS course. Conclusion The evaluation of PHTLS courses in Germany indicates the necessity for special prehospital trauma care training. Paramedics and physicians criticize deficits in their professional training, which can be compensated by PHTLS. With respect to relevant items like confidence and knowledge PHTLS leads to a statistically significant increase in ratings on a visual analogue scale. PHTLS should be integrated into the curriculum at Medical School.
机译:背景技术这项研究的目的是检查德国的PHTLS提供者课程,并证明可以优化院前创伤护理中医生和护理人员组成的假设。方法PHTLS参与者被要求在课程准备期间和课程结束后填写标准化问卷。关于他们的专业背景有一些悬而未决的问题,关于PHTLS本身有一些悬而未决的问题。为了量化主观上的信心,知识印象并描述个人的教育和培训水平,还需要在模拟量表上回答其他问题。结果共分析问卷247份。医师指出,他们在专业培训方面的缺陷比护理人员要多(p <0.001)。 80%的护理人员确认接受了院前创伤护理方面的充分培训,所有医生都声称在医学院对院前创伤护理情况没有进行充分的培训。在统计学上,医师对医护人员的满意度最高(p <0.001)。虽然大多数参与者都给出了积极的反馈意见,但麻醉师对PHTLS的看法却不那么相信(p = 0.005),并未像其他麻醉者那样受益(p = 0.004),并且更多地指出,该过程对他们的日常工作没有什么价值( p = 0.03)。疗程结束后,置信度显着提高,达到了比疗程之前更高的比率(p <0.001)。在PHTLS之后,两组在课程概念上均显示相似的评分,表明PHTLS可以弥补一些训练不足,并有助于在院前创伤情况下获得信心和保证。 90%的护理人员和100%的医生会推荐PHTLS。在参加了PHTLS课程后,内科医生特别是麻醉师修改了他们关于在医学院提供PHTLS的意见。结论在德国对PHTLS课程的评估表明有必要进行特殊的院前创伤护理培训。护理人员和医生批评他们的专业培训不足,可以通过PHTLS来弥补。关于置信度和知识等相关项目,PHTLS导致视觉模拟量表的评分在统计上显着提高。 PHTLS应该被整合到医学院的课程中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号