首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics >Creativity in Higher Education: Comparative Genetic Analyses on the Dopaminergic System in Relation to Creativity, Addiction, Schizophrenia in Humans and Non-Human Primates
【24h】

Creativity in Higher Education: Comparative Genetic Analyses on the Dopaminergic System in Relation to Creativity, Addiction, Schizophrenia in Humans and Non-Human Primates

机译:高等教育中的创造力:多巴胺能系统与人类和非人类灵长类动物的创造力,成瘾,精神分裂症的比较遗传分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Learning a new concept requires the mind to enter into a state of disequilibrium and then progress through identified stages to re-establish eventually a new state of equilibrium. The human intellect persists in a dynamical equilibrium state while maintaining self-satisfaction and a contented worldview by constantly integrating and assimilating incoming information that resonates with its current understanding and previous experiences. This equilibrium state allows reflective thought and reassurance to the individual about what is already known albeit it with a limited generalization. However, with the onset of receiving and assimilating a new concept, you are thrown into a state of mental disequilibrium. It is the need to remove the disequilibrium that requires either critical thinking by the individual, resulting in an expanded worldview, or a discounting of it while maintaining a disengaging behavior. The former allows re-establishment of mental equilibrium with an expanded understanding, and the latter persists by never departing from equilibrium. In either case, the intellect has its equilibrium-one instance with requisite development of new understanding, the other without change. To restrict the onslaught of a constant barrage of new concepts, underprepared students avoid majoring in the physical sciences, opting instead to pursue other majors or to take fewer physical science courses. To address the lack of effective learning, we have developed the notion that individual Symbolic Mental Structures, as a key component of constructivism, can assist the underachieving student to become more engaged in the physical sciences and academia in general. This approach requires us to revisit Piaget's constructivism theory, Karl Popper theory with its falsifiability criterion, which supports the former, and to consider Bloom's affective and cognitive domains.
机译:学习一个新概念需要头脑进入一种不平衡状态,然后逐步进入确定的阶段以最终重新建立新的平衡状态。人类的智力通过不断整合和吸收与其当前理解和先前经验相呼应的信息,在保持自我满足和满意的世界观的同时保持动态平衡状态。这种平衡状态允许人们对已知的事物进行反思性思考和保证,尽管概括性有限。但是,随着接受和吸收一个新概念的开始,您陷入了心理失衡的状态。有必要消除这种不平衡,这种不平衡需要个人进行批判性思考,从而导致世界观的扩大,或者在维持脱节行为的同时轻视它。前者允许在扩展的理解下重新建立心理平衡,而后者则通过从未脱离平衡来坚持下去。在这两种情况下,智力都有其平衡-一个实例需要新的理解发展,另一个实例则没有变化。为了限制不断涌现的新概念的冲击,准备不足的学生避免主修物理科学,而是选择修读其他专业或选修更少的物理科学课程。为了解决缺乏有效学习的问题,我们提出了这样的观念,即个体象征性心理结构作为建构主义的关键组成部分,可以帮助成绩不佳的学生更全面地参与物理科学和学术界。这种方法要求我们重新审视皮亚杰的建构主义理论,卡尔·波普尔理论及其可证伪性标准,以支持前者,并考虑布鲁姆的情感和认知领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号