首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research >Food for Thought: Restaurants and Place Making
【24h】

Food for Thought: Restaurants and Place Making

机译:思考的食物:餐厅和地方制作

获取原文
       

摘要

A bare geographic space is like a brand-new home that hasn’t been lived in yet. As people begin to inhabit these spaces, they build into it to make it representative of themselves, much like we design and set up our houses to turn them into homes. This is how a place goes from just being a location to something that has a deeper meaning to its inhabitants. We look to create into the spaces we inhabit our own little corner of what is familiar to us, so that we can call a space our own. This is the essence of what place making is, and it happens through a variety of ways. Place making has been studied in the past by numerous scholars. This article takes a look at place making on a college campus, with the main focus being on place making for ethnic minority communities. It questions the strengths and benefits of place making, as well as what detrimental effects can be there when a group is denied the ability to practice place making. Four groups that have been chosen for the study: the Indian community, the Chinese community, the Japanese community and the African American community. While the article looks at the strengths of place making as a whole, special emphasis has been placed on restaurants as the agents of place making for reasons outlined later in the paper.
机译:裸露的地理空间就像是尚未居住的全新房屋。当人们开始居住在这些空间中时,他们就将它们建在其中以使其具有代表性,就像我们设计和建造房屋以将其变成房屋一样。这是一个地方从仅仅成为一个位置到对居民具有更深层意义的事物的方式。我们希望在我们熟悉的事物的角落里创造一个我们自己居住的空间,以便我们可以称自己的空间为己有。这是场所营造的本质,它通过多种方式发生。过去,许多学者研究过场所制作。本文介绍了大学校园中的场所制作,主要重点是少数民族社区的场所制作。它质疑场所制作的优势和好处,以及当一群人被剥夺实践场所制作能力的能力时可能产生的不利影响。已选择进行研究的四个群体:印度社区,华人社区,日本社区和非裔美国人社区。虽然本文从整体上探讨了场所制作的优势,但由于本文稍后概述的原因,我们特别强调了餐馆作为场所制作的代理人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号