首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pathology Informatics >A quantitative approach to evaluate image quality of whole slide imaging scanners
【24h】

A quantitative approach to evaluate image quality of whole slide imaging scanners

机译:评价整个幻灯片成像扫描仪图像质量的定量方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Context&58; The quality of images produced by whole slide imaging (WSI) scanners has a direct influence on the readers′ performance and reliability of the clinical diagnosis. Therefore, WSI scanners should produce not only high quality but also consistent quality images. Aim&58; We aim to evaluate reproducibility of WSI scanners based on the quality of images produced over time and among multiple scanners. The evaluation is independent of content or context of test specimen. Methods&58; The ultimate judge of image quality is a pathologist, however, subjective evaluations are heavily influenced by the complexity of a case and subtle variations introduced by a scanner can be easily overlooked. Therefore, we employed a quantitative image quality assessment method based on clinically relevant parameters, such as sharpness and brightness, acquired in a survey of pathologists. The acceptable level of quality per parameter was determined in a subjective study. The evaluation of scanner reproducibility was conducted with Philips Ultra-Fast Scanners. A set of 36 HercepTest? slides were used in three substudies addressing variations due to systems and time, producing 8640 test images for evaluation. Results&58; The results showed that the majority of images in all the substudies are within the acceptable quality level&59; however, some scanners produce higher quality images more often than others. The results are independent of case types, and they match our perception of quality. Conclusion&58; The quantitative image quality assessment method was successfully applied in the HercepTest? slides to evaluate WSI scanner reproducibility. The proposed method is generic and applicable to any other types of slide stains and scanners.
机译:上下文&58;整个幻灯片成像(WSI)扫描仪产生的图像质量直接影响阅读器的性能和临床诊断的可靠性。因此,WSI扫描仪不仅应产生高质量的图像,而且还应产生质量稳定的图像。目标&58;我们旨在根据随时间推移以及在多个扫描仪之间产生的图像质量来评估WSI扫描仪的可重复性。评估与试样的内容或背景无关。方法&58;图像质量的最终判断者是病理学家,但是,主观评估受案件复杂性的影响很大,而扫描仪引入的细微差异很容易被忽略。因此,我们采用了基于临床相关参数(例如清晰度和亮度)的定量图像质量评估方法,这些参数是在病理学家的调查中获得的。在主观研究中确定每个参数的可接受质量水平。使用飞利浦超快速扫描仪对扫描仪的再现性进行评估。一组36个HercepTest吗?幻灯片被用于三个子研究中,以解决由于系统和时间造成的变化,产生8640张测试图像进​​行评估。结果&58;结果表明,所有子研究中的大多数图像都在可接受的质量水平之内[59];但是,某些扫描仪比其他扫描仪更经常产生更高质量的图像。结果与案例类型无关,并且与我们对质量的看法相符。结论&58;定量图像质量评估方法已成功应用于HercepTest?幻灯片以评估WSI扫描仪的可重复性。所提出的方法是通用的,并且适用于任何其他类型的幻灯片染料和扫描仪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号