首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes >Haematologists’ experiences implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an outpatient clinic: a qualitative study for applied practice
【24h】

Haematologists’ experiences implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an outpatient clinic: a qualitative study for applied practice

机译:血液科医师在门诊诊所实施患者报告的结局指标(PROM)的经验:应用实践的定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundThe patient-doctor relationship is crucial to provide person-centred care, allowing the alleviation of symptom burden caused by disease or treatment. Implementing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is suggested to inform the decision-making process and lead to initiation of care. Yet there are knowledge gaps regarding how meaningful it is to incorporate PROMs in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to investigate haematologists’ experiences when PROMs were implemented in an outpatient setting.MethodsFourteen participant observations, 13 individual interviews and three in-depth interviews were conducted with haematologists, guided by the qualitative methodology Interpretive Description. Analysis was inspired by Habermas’ critical theoretical framework.ResultsThe haematologists included were characterised by dichotomous experiences with PROMs, either resistant to or supporting their implementation.None were observed to elaborate on PROMs during consultations: instead, primary attention was spent discussing the hematological agenda dictated by the system.ConclusionThe use of PROMs for individualized care was linked with extensive uncertainties and PROMs were not requested by the haematologists. To improve individualized care, other approaches may be more suitable. If PROMs are to be incorporated into future clinical practice, they should be tested tothe specific patient group and involve relevant users.
机译:摘要背景医患关系对于提供以人为本的护理至关重要,它可以减轻疾病或治疗引起的症状负担。建议实施患者报告的结果措施(PROM),以为决策过程提供信息并导致就医。然而,关于将PROM纳入临床环境的意义还存在知识鸿沟。这项研究的目的是调查血液科医师在门诊环境中实施PROM时的经验。方法在定性方法解释说明的指导下,对血液科医师进行了十四次参与者观察,13次个人访谈和三次深度访谈。分析的灵感来自哈贝马斯的批判性理论框架。结果包括的血液学家以对PROM的二分经验为特征,无论是抗药性还是支持其实施;在咨询过程中没有人详细阐述PROM:相反,主要精力用于讨论血液学议程结论将PROM用于个体护理存在广泛的不确定性,血液学家不要求使用PROM。为了改善个性化护理,其他方法可能更合适。如果将PROM纳入未来的临床实践中,则应针对特定的患者组进行测试,并让相关用户参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号