首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Physics: Conference Series >Perceptions of prospective chemistry teachers about the skills of writing argument-based teaching material on voltaic cell subject
【24h】

Perceptions of prospective chemistry teachers about the skills of writing argument-based teaching material on voltaic cell subject

机译:准化学老师对基于参数的伏打电池学科教材的写作技巧的看法

获取原文
           

摘要

Teaching materials and scientific argumentation should be provided to prospective chemistry teachers to fulfil their required professional competencies. The study aims to investigate the information about the students' perceptions concerning the ability in writing argument-based teaching materials for prospective teachers on voltaic cell subject. Twenty-one students of chemistry education program at the fifth semester, who are taking the subject of school chemistry in one university in Bandung, West Java, are chosen as the participants of this study. Questionnaires and interview are employed as the instruments. They are used to investigate the students' perceptions towards the characteristics of voltaic cell materials. The ability to draw a scientific argumentation (involve claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal) is revealed through the instruments of teaching materials writing task assessment. This study indicates that most of students's perception are that prospective chemistry teachers have to be able to write teaching materials and scientific argumentation and voltaic cell materials are easy to comprehend because it is a concrete material. The students have a difficulty to find a topic and to distinguish warrant component, backing, qualifier, rebuttal. Furthermore, the argumentation ability possessed by the students on their teaching materials is still considered in low category.
机译:应向预期的化学教师提供教材和科学论证,以实现其所需的专业能力。这项研究旨在调查有关学生对伏打电池学科准教师撰写基于论证的教材的能力的看法的信息。第五学期的21名化学教育学生正在西爪哇万隆的一所大学学习化学课程,被选为这项研究的参与者。问卷和访谈被用作工具。它们用于调查学生对伏打电池材料特性的看法。通过编写任务评估的教材可以揭示出提出科学论证的能力(涉及索赔,数据,手令,支持,限定词,反驳)。这项研究表明,大多数学生的看法是,准化学老师必须能够编写教材和科学论证,并且伏打电池材料很容易理解,因为它是一种具体材料。学生很难找到一个话题,难以区分认股权证的组成部分,支持,限定词,反驳。此外,学生在其教材上拥有的论证能力仍被归为低类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号