...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice >Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand
【24h】

Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand

机译:在三个新兴市场吸收新的抗糖尿病药物:巴西,中国和泰国之间的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives New antidiabetic medications such as insulin analogues and thiazolidinediones have been introduced over the last decade. This study compares the uptake of new agents in three emerging pharmaceutical markets: Brazil, China, and Thailand. Methods Using longitudinal IMS Health sales data, we calculated the quarterly percentage market share for types of insulins and oral hypoglycemic agents from 2002 through 2012 in each country. New oral hypoglycemic agents included: alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and non-sulfonylurea secretagogues. Results While China had the highest use of insulin cartridges and pens (85.6% in 2010), Brazil was the earliest adopter of insulin analogues and had the greatest use of these products overall (44.6% of the insulin market) in 2010, which then decreased by almost half by 2012. Together, sulfonylureas and metformin dominated the markets in Brazil and Thailand (~89% and ~96% respectively) over the 10-year period. Between 2002 and 2012, there was a shift in use from sulfonylureas to metformin; the market share of newer agents remained 10% or less in both countries. In China, however, market share of new oral agents grew rapidly from 13.1% to 44.4%. While metformin use was relatively stable in China (one-third of the market), sulfonylureas declined substantially over the 10-year period (41.5% to 20.8%). Conclusion Given large cost differentials between newer and older insulins and among oral hypoglycemic agents, it is important to evaluate uptake of newer products over time. Uptake patterns differed in the study countries, likely due to different medicines policy approaches. Future research should evaluate how trends in use of antidiabetic products align with national clinical practice guidelines and pharmaceutical policies, as well as the impacts of different patterns of use on cost and clinical outcomes.
机译:目的在过去的十年中,已经引入了新的抗糖尿病药物,例如胰岛素类似物和噻唑烷二酮。这项研究比较了巴西,中国和泰国这三个新兴医药市场对新药的吸收。方法利用IMS Health的纵向销售数据,我们计算了2002年至2012年每个国家的胰岛素和口服降糖药类型的季度市场份额。新的口服降糖药包括:α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂,噻唑烷二酮,二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂和非磺酰脲促分泌剂。结果尽管中国使用的胰岛素笔和笔最多(2010年为85.6%),但巴西是最早使用胰岛素类似物的国家,并且在2010年使用的胰岛素类似物最多(占胰岛素市场的44.6%),然后下降了到2012年将近一半。磺酰脲类和二甲双胍在过去10年中共同主导了巴西和泰国的市场(分别为89%和96%)。在2002年至2012年之间,使用的方式从磺酰脲改为二甲双胍。在这两个国家,新型代理商的市场份额都保持在10%或以下。然而,在中国,新型口服剂的市场份额从13.1%迅速增长到44.4%。尽管二甲双胍的使用在中国相对稳定(占市场的三分之一),但磺脲类药物在10年期间大幅下降(从41.5%降至20.8%)。结论鉴于新旧胰岛素之间以及口服降糖药之间存在较大的成本差异,因此评估随时间推移对新产品的摄取至关重要。在研究国家中,摄取方式不同,可能是由于不同的药物政策方法所致。未来的研究应评估抗糖尿病产品的使用趋势如何符合国家临床实践指南和药物政策,以及不同使用方式对成本和临床结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号