...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Duloxetine 60 mg for chronic low back pain: post hoc responder analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials
【24h】

Duloxetine 60 mg for chronic low back pain: post hoc responder analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

机译:度洛西汀60 mg用于慢性下腰痛:双盲,安慰剂对照试验的事后响应者分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy in chronic low back pain (CLBP). We examined the predictors of response to duloxetine for CLBP. Patients and methods: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from 4 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of duloxetine (60?mg/day for 12–14?weeks) in adult patients with CLBP. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with ≥30% reduction in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain (“pain reduction”) at 12–14?weeks. The proportion of patients with ≥30% and ≥50% (secondary outcome) pain reduction in duloxetine and placebo groups was compared. Variables for responder analyses were early improvement (≥15% pain reduction at Week 2), sex, age, baseline BPI average pain score, duration of CLBP, and number of painful body sites according to the Michigan Body Map (≥2 vs 1 [isolated CLBP]; 1 trial); relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results: Compared with placebo (n = 653), a greater proportion of duloxetine-treated patients (n = 642) achieved ≥30% (59.7% vs 47.8%; P < 0.001) and ≥50% pain reduction (48.6% vs 35.1%; P < 0.001). Among duloxetine-treated patients, early improvement was associated with greater likelihood of ≥30% (RR [95% CI], 2.91 [2.30–3.67]) or ≥50% (3.24 [2.44–4.31]) pain reduction. Women were slightly more likely than men to achieve ≥30% (RR [95% CI], 1.14 [1.00–1.30]) or ≥50% (1.17 [0.99–1.38]) pain reduction. Response rates were similar between age, CLBP duration, and baseline BPI average pain score subgroups. Patients with ≥2 painful sites were more likely to respond to duloxetine 60?mg relative to placebo than patients with isolated CLBP (RR, duloxetine vs placebo [95% CI]: ≥30% reduction, ≥2 painful sites 1.40 [1.18–1.66], isolated CLBP 1.07 [0.78–1.48]; ≥50% reduction, ≥2 painful sites 1.51 [1.20–1.89], isolated CLBP 1.23 [0.81–1.88]). Conclusion: Early pain reduction was indicative of overall response. Patients with multiple painful sites had more benefit from duloxetine than patients with isolated CLBP.
机译:简介:度洛西汀已证明可治疗慢性下腰痛(CLBP)。我们检查了CLBP对度洛西汀反应的预测因子。患者和方法:这是对成年CLBP成年患者接受4项度洛西汀(60 mg /天,连续12-14周)的双盲,随机,安慰剂对照试验的汇总数据的事后分析。主要结局是在12-14周时,短暂疼痛清单(BPI)平均疼痛(“疼痛减轻”)减少≥30%的患者比例。比较度洛西汀组和安慰剂组疼痛减轻≥30%和≥50%(继发结局)的患者比例。响应者分析的变量包括早期改善(第2周疼痛减轻≥15%),性别,年龄,基线BPI平均疼痛评分,CLBP持续时间以及根据密歇根州人体分布图(≥2比1 [分离的CLBP]; 1个试验);计算相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:与安慰剂相比(n = 653),接受度洛西汀治疗的患者(n = 642)的比例≥30%(59.7%vs 47.8%; P <0.001)和≥50%疼痛减轻(48.6%vs 35.1) %; P <0.001)。在接受度洛西汀治疗的患者中,早期缓解与更大程度的减轻疼痛的可能性相关(≥RR [95%CI],2.91 [2.30-3.67])或≥50%(3.24 [2.44-4.31])。与男性相比,女性减轻疼痛的可能性略高于男性(RR [95%CI],1.14 [1.00-1.30])或≥50%(1.17 [0.99-1.38])≥50%。年龄,CLBP持续时间和基线BPI平均疼痛评分亚组之间的缓解率相似。 ≥2个疼痛部位的患者相对于安慰剂对多洛西汀60?mg的反应比单独的CLBP患者更容易发生反应(RR,度洛西汀与安慰剂[95%CI]:≥30%减少,≥2个疼痛部位1.40 [1.18–1.66 ],孤立的CLBP 1.07 [0.78–1.48];减少≥50%,≥2个疼痛部位1.51 [1.20–1.89],孤立的CLBP 1.23 [0.81-1.88])。结论:早期疼痛减轻表明总体反应。具有多处疼痛部位的患者比单独的CLBP患者受益于度洛西汀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号