...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimal access surgery >Prospective analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for renal tumours more than 7 cm
【24h】

Prospective analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for renal tumours more than 7 cm

机译:腹腔镜与开放式根治性肾切除术对7 cm以上肾脏肿瘤的前瞻性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: To analyse the feasibility of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for renal tumours 7 cm and to compare the operative and oncologic outcomes with open radical nephrectomy (ORN). Settings and Design: This was a prospective, observational, comparative study. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care super-speciality hospital. All the patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for 7 cm renal tumours during a period of 2 years (April 2012 to May 2014) were included in the study. Thirty patients were included in each ORN and LRN group. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data for all these patients were collected and analysed. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 11.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL). Results: Mean age of patients in ORN and LRN groups was 57.3 ± 6.1 years and 54.9 ± 5.7 years, respectively (P = 0.220). As compared to ORN, LRN had less drop in post-operative haemoglobin (1.39 ± 0.55 g/dl vs. 4.07 ± 1.023 g/dl, P 0.05), less drop in haematocrit value (4.7 ± 3.25% vs. 9.5 ± 5.13%, P 0.05), less analgesic requirement for tramadol hydrochloride (165 ± 74.5 mg vs. 260 ± 181.66 mg) and less mean hospital stay (4.2 days vs. 6.1 days, P 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in post-operative complication rate and recurrence-free survival over a median follow-up of 17 months (93.9% – LRN vs. 90% – ORN) Conclusions: LRN for large renal tumours is feasible and achieves oncologic outcomes similar to that obtained with ORN.
机译:目的:分析腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)治疗> 7 cm肾肿瘤的可行性,并比较开放性根治性肾切除术(ORN)的手术和肿瘤学结局。设置与设计:这是一项前瞻性,观察性比较研究。受试者与方法:该研究是在三级护理专科医院进行的。该研究纳入了在2年内(2012年4月至2014年5月)接受根治性肾切除术治疗> 7 cm肾肿瘤的所有患者。每个ORN和LRN组中包括30名患者。收集并分析所有这些患者的术前,术中和术后数据。使用的统计分析:社会科学统计软件包(SPSS,用于Windows的11.0版,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)。结果:ORN和LRN组患者的平均年龄分别为57.3±6.1岁和54.9±5.7岁(P = 0.220)。与ORN相比,LRN术后血红蛋白下降较少(1.39±0.55 g / dl对4.07±1.023 g / dl,P <0.05),血细胞比容值下降较少(4.7±3.25%对9.5±5.13 %,P <0.05),盐酸曲马多的镇痛需求较少(165±74.5 mg vs. 260±181.66 mg),平均住院时间也较少(4.2天与6.1天,P <0.05)。中位随访17个月,术后并发症发生率和无复发生存率无统计学差异(93.9%– LRN vs. 90%– ORN)结论:LRN适用于大型肾脏肿瘤,是可行的,并且可以达到肿瘤结果类似于使用ORN获得的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号