首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean medical science. >Comparison of Costs of Endovascular Repair versus Open Surgical Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Korea
【24h】

Comparison of Costs of Endovascular Repair versus Open Surgical Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Korea

机译:韩国腹主动脉瘤的腔内修复和开腹手术修复费用比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This study was designed to compare the hospital-related costs of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment and cost structure between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) in Korean health care system. One hundred five primary elective AAA repairs (79 OSRs and 26 EVARs) performed in the Seoul National University Hospital from 2005 to 2009 were included. Patient characteristics were similar between two groups except for older age ( P = 0.004) and more frequent history of malignancy ( P = 0.031) in EVAR group. Thirty-day mortality rate was similar between two groups and there was no AAA-related mortality in both groups for 5 yr after repair. The total in-hospital costs for the index admission were significantly higher in EVAR patients (mean, KRW19,857,119) than OSR patients (mean KRW12,395,507) ( P
机译:本研究旨在比较韩国卫生保健系统中血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)和开放手术修复(OSR)之间的选择性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)治疗的医院相关费用和费用结构。其中包括2005年至2009年在首尔国立大学医院进行的1-5次主要AAA选修(79个OSR和26个EVAR)。两组之间的患者特征相似,除了年龄较大(P = 0.004)和EVAR组的恶性病史更频繁(P = 0.031)。两组的30天死亡率相似,修复后5年内两组均没有AAA相关的死亡率。 EVAR患者的入院总住院费用(平均为19,857,119韩元)明显高于OSR患者的平均入院费用(12,395,507韩元)(P

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号