首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >Medium-term effects of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease
【24h】

Medium-term effects of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease

机译:Dynesys动态稳定与后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗多节段性腰椎退行性疾病的中期效果

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To compare the medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of Dynesys dynamic stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for treatment of multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease. Methods Fifty-seven patients with multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease underwent Dynesys stabilization (n?=?26) or PLIF (n?=?31) from December 2008 to February 2010. The mean follow-up period was 50.3 (range, 46–65) months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Radiographic evaluations included disc height and range of motion (ROM) of the operative segments and proximal adjacent segment on lumbar flexion-extension X-rays. The intervertebral disc signal change was defined by magnetic resonance imaging, and disc degeneration was classified by the Pfirrmann grade. Results The clinical outcomes including the VAS score and ODI were significantly improved in both groups at 3 months and the final follow-up, but the difference between the two was not significant. At the final follow-up, the disc height of stabilized segments in both groups was significantly increased; the increase was more notable in the Dynesys than PLIF group. The ROM of stabilized segments at the final follow-up decreased from 6.20° to 2.76° and 6.56° to 0.00° in the Dynesys and PLIF groups, respectively. There was no distinct change in the height of the proximal adjacent segment in the two groups. The ROM of the proximal adjacent segment in both groups increased significantly at the final follow-up; the change was significantly greater in the PLIF than Dynesys group. Only one case of adjacent segment degeneration occurred in the PLIF group, and this patient underwent a second operation. Conclusions Both Dynesys stabilization and PLIF can improve the clinical and radiographic outcomes of multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease. Compared with PLIF, Dynesys stabilization can maintain the mobility of the stabilized segments with less influence on the proximal adjacent segment and may help to prevent the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration. Dynesys is reliable for the treatment of multisegmental lumbar degenerative disease at the medium-term follow-up.
机译:目的比较Dynesys动态稳定和后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)治疗多节段性腰椎退行性疾病的中期临床和影像学结果。方法2008年12月至2010年2月,对57例多节段性腰椎退行性疾病患者进行Dynesys稳定(n?=?26)或PLIF(n?=?31)。平均随访期为50.3(范围46-65)。 )个月。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估临床结局。射线照相评估包括腰椎屈伸X线片的椎间盘高度和手术段以及近端相邻段的运动范围(ROM)。通过磁共振成像确定椎间盘信号变化,并根据Pfirrmann等级对椎间盘退变进行分类。结果两组在3个月及最终随访时,包括VAS评分和ODI在内的临床结局均得到了明显改善,但两组之间的差异并不显着。在最后的随访中,两组稳定节段的椎间盘高度均显着增加。 Dynesys的增长比PLIF组更明显。在Dynesys和PLIF组中,最终随访时稳定节段的ROM分别从6.20°降至2.76°和6.56°至0.00°。两组的近端相邻节段的高度没有明显变化。在最后的随访中,两组的近端相邻节段的ROM均显着增加。 PLIF的变化明显大于Dynesys组。 PLIF组仅发生一例相邻节段变性,该患者接受了第二次手术。结论Dynesys稳定剂和PLIF均可改善多节段性腰椎退行性疾病的临床和影像学结果。与PLIF相比,Dynesys稳定可以保持稳定段的活动性,而对近端相邻段的影响较小,并且可以帮助防止发生相邻段变性。 Dynesys在中期随访中可可靠地治疗多节段性腰椎退行性疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号