...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intensive Care >Risk factors and clinical outcomes of arrhythmias in the medical intensive care unit
【24h】

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of arrhythmias in the medical intensive care unit

机译:重症监护室心律不齐的危险因素和临床结局

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundThe clinical impact of arrhythmias on the continuum of critical illness is unclear, and data in medical intensive care units (ICU) is lacking. In this study, we distinguish between different types of arrhythmias and evaluate if their distinction is of clinical importance based on ICU length of stay and mortality outcomes. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 215 patients in a community-based teaching hospital medical ICU. Variables gathered include sociodemographic data, arrhythmias identified and interpreted by the study team, and admission diagnoses coded into clinical mediator categories based on theorized common risk pathways. Univariable and multivariable Poisson regression models were used to identify risk factors for developing arrhythmias by type, prolonged length of stay, and hospital mortality. ResultsSignificant arrhythmia was detected in 28.8?% of subjects with most new arrhythmia events developing within the first 3?days of ICU stay. Acute myocardial ischemia and acute kidney injury at the time of ICU admission were associated with an increased risk of developing supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA) (RR?=?2.02; 95?% CI 1.08–3.78 and RR?=?1.93; 95?%CI 1.09–3.37, respectively). SVA in the first 3?days of ICU stay was associated with an increased risk of prolonged ICU stay (RR?=?1.47; 95?% CI 1.09–1.97). After controlling for clinical mediators, development of SVA was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality. No mediators significantly increased the risk of developing ventricular arrhythmias (VA). VA were not associated to prolonged ICU stay but were associated with increased risk of hospital mortality (RR?=?1.93; 95?% CI 1.18–3.15). ConclusionsIt is important to distinguish between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias for outcomes in the medical ICU setting. Developing a new VA increases the risk of in-hospital mortality independently. Developing a new SVA increases the risk of having a prolonged ICU stay but does not appear to increase in-hospital mortality independently. These findings suggest that the development of a VA should be considered an independent morbid event and not necessarily the end result of a complicated clinical course, while a new SVA may be considered a cardiac complication of the disease continuum which may add complexity to an ICU stay.
机译:背景心律不齐对危重病连续性的临床影响尚不清楚,并且缺乏医疗重症监护病房(ICU)的数据。在这项研究中,我们区分不同类型的心律失常,并根据ICU住院时间和死亡率结果评估它们的区分是否具有临床重要性。方法我们对社区教学医院医疗ICU中的215例患者进行了回顾性分析。收集的变量包括社会人口统计学数据,研究小组确定和解释的心律失常以及根据理论上常见的风险途径将入院诊断编码为临床介体类别。使用单变量和多变量Poisson回归模型按类型,住院时间延长和住院死亡率确定发生心律失常的危险因素。结果在ICU住院的前3天内,发生新心律失常事件最多的受试者中,有28.8%发现了严重的心律失常。入ICU时的急性心肌缺血和急性肾损伤与发生室上性心律失常(SVA)的风险增加相关(RR?=?2.02; 95%?CI 1.08-3.78和RR?=?1.93; 95 %% CI分别为1.09–3.37)。在ICU住院的前3天,SVA与ICU住院时间延长的风险增加相关(RR?= 1.47; 95%CI 1.09–1.97)。在控制了临床介体后,SVA的发生与院内死亡率并没有独立相关。没有介体会显着增加发生室性心律不齐(VA)的风险。 VA与延长ICU住院时间无关,但与医院死亡风险增加相关(RR?=?1.93; 95%?CI 1.18–3.15)。结论在医学ICU情况下,区分室上性和室性心律失常很重要。开发新的VA独立增加院内死亡的风险。开发新的SVA增加了延长ICU停留时间的风险,但似乎并没有独立增加医院内死亡率。这些发现表明,应将VA的发展视为独立的病态事件,而不一定是复杂的临床过程的最终结果,而新的SVA可能被视为疾病连续体的心脏并发症,这可能会增加ICU住院的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号