首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intensive Care >Fluid responsiveness prediction using Vigileo FloTrac measured cardiac output changes during passive leg raise test
【24h】

Fluid responsiveness prediction using Vigileo FloTrac measured cardiac output changes during passive leg raise test

机译:使用Vigileo FloTrac进行的液体反应性预测可测量被动腿抬高测试期间的心输出量变化

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundPassive leg raising (PLR) is a so called self-volume challenge used to test for fluid responsiveness. Changes in cardiac output (CO) or stroke volume (SV) measured during PLR are used to predict the need for subsequent fluid loading. This requires a device that can measure CO changes rapidly. The Vigileo? monitor, using third-generation software, allows continuous CO monitoring. The aim of this study was to compare changes in CO (measured with the Vigileo device) during a PLR manoeuvre to calculate the accuracy for predicting fluid responsiveness. MethodsThis is a prospective study in a 20-bedded mixed general critical care unit in a large non-university regional referral hospital. Fluid responders were defined as having an increase in CO of greater than 15?% following a fluid challenge. Patients meeting the criteria for circulatory shock with a Vigileo? monitor (Vigileo?; FloTrac; Edwards?; Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) already in situ, and assessed as requiring volume expansion by the clinical team based on clinical criteria, were included. All patients underwent a PLR manoeuvre followed by a fluid challenge. ResultsData was collected and analysed on stroke volume variation (SVV) at baseline and CO and SVV changes during the PLR manoeuvre and following a subsequent fluid challenge in 33 patients. The majority had septic shock. Patient characteristics, baseline haemodynamic variables and baseline vasoactive infusion requirements were similar between fluid responders (10 patients) and non-responders (23 patients). Peak increase in CO occurred within 120?s during the PLR in all cases. Using an optimal cut point of 9?% increase in CO during the PLR produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95?% CI 0.63 to 1.00) with a sensitivity of 80?% (95?% CI 44 to 96?%) and a specificity of 91?% (95?% CI 70 to 98?%). ConclusionsCO changes measured by the Vigileo? monitor using third-generation software during a PLR test predict fluid responsiveness in mixed medical and surgical patients with vasopressor-dependent circulatory shock.
机译:背景技术被动抬腿(PLR)是一种所谓的自我体量挑战,用于测试体液反应性。 PLR期间测得的心输出量(CO)或中风量(SV)的变化可用于预测后续液体负荷的需求。这需要一种能够快速测量CO变化的设备。维吉利奥?监控器使用第三代软件进行连续的一氧化碳监控。这项研究的目的是比较PLR操纵过程中CO的变化(用Vigileo设备测量),以计算预测流体反应性的准确性。方法这是一项在大型非大学区域转诊医院的20张床位的综合重症监护病房的前瞻性研究。流体反应者定义为在遇到流体挑战后,CO的增加大于15%。符合Vigileo标准的符合循环休克标准的患者?监测器(Vigileo?; FloTrac; Edwards?; Lifesciences,Irvine,CA,美国)已经就位,并被临床团队根据临床标准评估为需要扩大体积。所有患者均接受PLR操作,随后进行体液检查。结果收集并分析了基线时的卒中量变化(SVV)以及在PLR操作期间以及随后的33例患者进行体液刺激后CO和SVV变化的数据。大多数人患有败血性休克。在液体反应者(10例患者)和非反应者(23例患者)之间,患者特征,基线血流动力学变量和基线血管活性输注需求相似。在所有情况下,在PLR期间,CO的峰值增加都发生在120?s内。在PLR期间使用CO最佳增加9%的切点,在接收器工作特性曲线下的面积为0.85(95%CI为0.63至1.00),灵敏度为80%(95%CI为44至96)。特异性为91%(95%CI为70至98%)。结论由Vigileo衡量的CO变化?在PLR测试期间使用第三代软件进行监护,可预测患有升压药依赖性循环休克的混合医疗和手术患者的液体反应性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号