首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education >Key Lessons Learned from the Masters Degree Program in Water Resources Planning and Management
【24h】

Key Lessons Learned from the Masters Degree Program in Water Resources Planning and Management

机译:水资源规划与管理硕士学位课程的主要经验教训

获取原文
           

摘要

The need for practical inter-disciplinary approaches to water resource management has never been greater in the U.S. as it faces major challenges, ranging from an aging water infrastructure, to increased demands for water usage from competing sectors, to a greater incidence of coastal storm and inland flood events. As with flood damage reduction, navigation or environmental rehabilitation projects are no longer devised with a single objective in mind. Similarly, the stakeholder community has expanded appreciably in recent years, necessitating a professional staff not only technically skilled, but also able to effectively interact with diverse and often competing interests. However, as Kirshen et al., (2004) suggest, the design and execution of integrated, multidisciplinary curricula faces significant hurdles (see Russell in this issue).Planners from resource agencies such as the Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation traditionally receive their academic training within a single discipline, such as civil engineering or ecology, thus limiting their exposure to other critical areas that today's projects entail. Recognizing the challenges they faced with multi-objective planning, combined with a loss of senior planners largely due to attrition, the Corps’ leadership established a task force (USACE 2001) to make recommendations for strengthening expertise throughout its planning community. The resulting Planning Excellence Program included the development of the Corps’ Master's Degree Program in Water Resources Planning and Management (Masters Program).The Master's Program, which was formed in partnership with the Universities Council on Water Resources (UCOWR), was unique in its emphasis on inter-departmental curricula. Seven “core” courses were identified to ensure that prospective students were exposed to the varied topics of economics, law, hydrology, engineering, ecology, and participatory planning (UCOWR 2001). A capstone seminar was envisioned to integrate the disciplines through practical test cases. After soliciting interest throughout the UCOWR network, it was determined that five separate universities were equipped and receptive to participating in the program. They were not only willing to promote an inter-disciplinary degree program, but also to waive some of the on-campus residency requirements. The universities eventually agreeing to participate were the University of Florida, the University of Arizona, Southern Illinois University, the Johns Hopkins University and Harvard University.At the time the program was devised, the Corps had ample training programs to which interested students within the Corps were encouraged to apply. Unfortunately, by the time the Master's Program was launched in 2002, those targeted training budgets were either terminated or significantly curtailed. The resulting loss of centralized training opportunities meant that the individual Corps districts would, in large measure, have to fund their students within their own budgets. The end result was a much lower level of applicants than expected. Consequently, the training model that seemed to have all the right ingredients thus far appears to be unworkable, given the loss of application incentives. This meant that the universities that helped create the program were required to devise their own means to keep their respective programs viable. The University of Arizona, for example, has appealed to regional organizations outside the Corps as a means to attract students, while the University of Florida has maximized the use of distance learning.In an attempt to bolster the program, a survey was conducted in the summer of 2006 under the auspices of the American Water Resources Association. It was carried out to solicit viewpoints from academicians and practitioners alike on how best to design and implement an integrated education program to meet water manager needs. The results of that survey were published later that year (Bourget 2006)
机译:在美国,对水资源管理的实际跨学科方法的需求从未如此迫切,因为它面临着重大挑战,从老化的水基础设施到竞争部门对用水的需求不断增加,到沿海风暴和水灾的发生率越来越高。内陆洪水事件。与减少洪灾损失一样,导航或环境修复项目也不再是一个单一目标。同样,利益相关者群体近年来也有了显着的增长,不仅需要专业的技术人员,而且还必须能够与多种多样且经常相互竞争的利益进行有效的互动。但是,正如Kirshen等人(2004)所建议的那样,综合性,多学科课程的设计和执行面临很大的障碍(请参阅本期的Russell)。资源机构(例如,工程兵团和垦殖局)的计划者通常会收到他们在单一学科(例如土木工程或生态学)中进行学术培训,因此限制了他们接触当今项目所需要的其他关键领域。考虑到他们在多目标计划中面临的挑战,以及主要由于人员流失而导致的高级计划人员流失,军团的领导层成立了一个工作队(USACE 2001),以提出建议,以加强整个计划界的专业知识。由此产生的卓越计划计划包括开发兵团水资源计划和管理硕士学位计划(硕士计划),该硕士计划是与大学水资源理事会(UCOWR)合作建立的,其独特之处在于其强调跨部门课程。确定了七个“核心”课程,以确保准学生能够接触到经济学,法学,水文学,工程学,生态学和参与性规划等各种主题(UCOWR 2001)。设想了一个顶点研讨会,以通过实际的测试案例来整合学科。在吸引整个UCOWR网络的兴趣后,确定有5所独立的大学已经配备并愿意参加该计划。他们不仅愿意推行跨学科学位课程,而且愿意放弃某些校园内居住要求。最终同意参加的大学是佛罗里达大学,亚利桑那大学,伊利诺伊州南部大学,约翰·霍普金斯大学和哈佛大学。在制定该计划时,军团有足够的训练计划,军团中有兴趣的学生接受该计划的训练。被鼓励申请。不幸的是,当硕士课程于2002年启动时,那些有针对性的培训预算要么被终止,要么被大幅削减。结果,失去了集中培训的机会,这意味着各个军区将不得不在自己的预算范围内为学生提供资金。最终结果是申请人数量大大低于预期。因此,鉴于失去了应用激励措施,迄今为止看来具有所有正确要素的培训模型似乎行不通。这意味着帮助创建该计划的大学必须设计自己的手段来保持各自计划的可行性。例如,亚利桑那大学(University of Arizona)呼吁军团外部的地区组织作为吸引学生的一种方式,而佛罗里达大学(University of Florida)则最大限度地利用远程学习。在2006年夏季由美国水资源协会赞助。这样做是为了征求院士和从业者的意见,以了解如何最好地设计和实施一项综合教育计划,以满足水资源管理者的需求。该调查的结果于当年晚些时候发布(Bourget 2006)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号