首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Food Technology >The Effect of Sanitizers on the Native Microflora of Mung Bean Seeds (Vigna radiata)
【24h】

The Effect of Sanitizers on the Native Microflora of Mung Bean Seeds (Vigna radiata)

机译:消毒剂对绿豆种子(Vigna radiata)原生微生物区系的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The ingredients of sanitizers varies from natural products such as botanical extracts (lemon and orange extract) and cleaning agents derived from natural plant oil to chemicals such as surfactant solutions, combinations of surfactants with organic or mineral acids and alkaline washes that can remove wax, soil, harmful substances including agricultural chemicals found on fruits and vegetables. Most companies do not make any claims about the microbial reduction in fruits and vegetables by using their sanitizers. This study was therefore conducted to evaluate the effect of five commercial sanitizers available in the local market (labeled as A, B, C, D and E) in reducing microbial population found on the mung bean seeds. About 10 g of mung bean seeds in a stomacher bag were treated with the test solutions for 10 min, shaken at 170 rpm and compared with untreated seeds and sterile deionised water. Microbial populations were enumerated by using Plate Count Agar (PCA) for total bacterial counts, Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) for yeast and mould and E. coli/coliform Agar for E. coli and coliforms. All cleansers were tested at minimum concentration as recommended by the manufacturer. Among the 5 commercial sanitizers, A, C and D were effective in significantly reducing yeast and mould to an undetectable level compared to B and E. Sanitizers A, C and D also showed comparable results in reducing the total bacterial counts compared to the other sanitizers. Only sanitizers A and B were effective in significantly reducing the E. coli and coliforms. All the 5 sanitizers did not inhibit the seeds from sprouting although, sanitizer D germination percentage was statistically difference from untreated seeds or seeds treated with sterile deionised water.
机译:消毒剂的成分从天然产品(例如植物提取物(柠檬和橙子提取物)和天然植物油衍生的清洁剂)到化学物质(例如表面活性剂溶液),表面活性剂与有机或无机酸的组合以及可以去除蜡,土壤的碱性洗涤液不等,有害物质,包括水果和蔬菜上的农药。大多数公司对使用其消毒剂的水果和蔬菜中的微生物减少没有任何要求。因此,本研究旨在评估本地市场上五种商用消毒剂(分别标记为A,B,C,D和E)对减少绿豆种子上微生物种群的影响。将试验袋中的约10 g绿豆种子用测试溶液处理10分钟,以170 rpm摇动,并与未处理的种子和无菌去离子水进行比较。通过使用平板计数琼脂(PCA)进行细菌总数计数,使用马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(PDA)进行酵母和霉菌计数以及使用大肠杆菌/大肠菌琼脂进行大肠杆菌和大肠菌群计数来计算微生物种群。所有清洁剂均按照制造商建议的最低浓度进行测试。在5种商用消毒剂中,A,C和D与B和E相比可有效地将酵母菌和霉菌显着降低至不可检测的水平.A,C和D消毒剂与其他消毒剂相比在减少细菌总数方面也显示出可比的结果。只有消毒剂A和B才能有效地减少大肠杆菌和大肠菌群。尽管这5种消毒剂均未抑制种子发芽,但消毒剂D的发芽率与未经处理的种子或用无菌去离子水处理过的种子在统计学上是不同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号