首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >A Test of the Efficacy of Field-Trip and Discussion Approaches to Teaching Integrated Science within a Constructivist Flavour
【24h】

A Test of the Efficacy of Field-Trip and Discussion Approaches to Teaching Integrated Science within a Constructivist Flavour

机译:实地考察的有效性检验和讨论建构主义风味的综合科学教学方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Discussion method of instruction and field trips, by their nature can be adjudged interactive teaching approaches. But it can be speculated that the discussion method, because of its additional characteristic of providing for negotiation/argument during instruction, can potentiate constructivist instructional strategy to produce superior achievement by integrated science students. This speculation was experimentally investigated in this study by using 47 (22 boys and 25 girls) junior secondary school students (grade 8) in Warri Municipality of Nigeria and a non-equivalent control group design. These students were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups and taught energy concepts. Analysis of posttest scores using a 2 x 2 (two levels of method of instruction and gender) ANOVA indicated that there was no significant effect of method (F(1,44) = 3.88, p > 0.05), gender (F(1,44) = 0.14, p > 0.05) and interaction of method by gender (F(1,44) = 2.98, p > 0.05). The implications of these results for integrated science teaching are addressed in this article.
机译:教学与实地考察的讨论方法,就其性质而言可以判定交互式教学方法。但是可以推测,讨论方法由于其在教学过程中提供协商/辩论的附加特性,可以增强建构主义的教学策略,从而使综合科学学生获得更好的成绩。在本研究中,通过使用尼日利亚瓦尔里市的47名(22名男孩和25名女孩)初中学生(8年级)和一个非等效对照组设计对这种推测进行了实验研究。这些学生被随机分配到治疗和对照组,并教授能量概念。使用2 x 2(两种水平的教学方法和性别)ANOVA分析后测验分数,表明该方法对性别(F(1,44,3.88,p> 0.05)的影响不明显。 44)= 0.14,p> 0.05)和按性别的方法交互作用(F(1,44)= 2.98,p> 0.05)。本文讨论了这些结果对综合科学教学的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号