首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >A Comparison Between Students’ Performance In Multiple Choice and Modified Essay Questions in the MBBS Pediatrics Examination at the College of Medicine, King Khalid University, KSA
【24h】

A Comparison Between Students’ Performance In Multiple Choice and Modified Essay Questions in the MBBS Pediatrics Examination at the College of Medicine, King Khalid University, KSA

机译:在哈萨克斯坦国王哈立德大学医学院的MBBS儿科考试中,学生在多项选择题和修正的作文题上的表现比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives : To investigate the relation between the students' scores in MCQs and MEQs of the summative assessment in pediatrics at the College of medicine KKU. Introduction : Student assessment is the most difficult task in medicine since it is ultimately related to human life and safety. Assessment can take different types of formats with advantages and disadvantages and there is no single prescribed method of choice. Research Methods : This is a quantitative, observational retrospective study enrolling 50 students who completed the final MBBS examination in pediatrics in 2015.The medical students’ scores in MCQs and MEQs in the final MBBS pediatrics examination were collected and SPSS used for analysis. Results : 52% of the students scored A and B, 46% scored C and 2% scored D and nobody scored F. The mean percentage scores in MCQs, MEQs and the combined are75.03%, 79.99% and 76.68% respectively. The standard deviation (SD) for MCQs, MEQs and combined are 0.0753, 0.0763 and 0.0559 respectively.There are no significant differences in means and SD. The correlation (CR) between MCQs and MEQs is -1.73%. The CR between MCQs and MEQs for those who scored A and B is 7.38% which could indicate a weak but significant +ve CR (p value 0.017), (table3). For those who scored C inverse CR (-74.38%) was observed between MCQs and MEQs. Discussion : The main finding of this study was the weakly negative CR between students' performance on MCQs and MEQs. Good performance in MCQs is not necessary correlated with good performance in LEQs. This is not in agreement with Oyebola et al. and Moqattash et al findings, who reported positive CR in the performance of their students. The discrepancy observed in performance between MCQs and MEQs could be explained by the subjectivity and the difficulty in avoiding bias in setting and marking essay questions. Key Words: multiple choice questions, Modified long essay questions, correlation.
机译:目的:探讨国立医学院医学院儿科总结评估中学生MCQs和MEQs之间的关系。简介:学生评估是医学上最困难的任务,因为它最终与人类生命和安全有关。评估可以采用不同类型的格式,各有其优缺点,并且没有单一的规定选择方法。研究方法:这是一项定量,观察性回顾性研究,招收了2015年完成儿科MBBS最终考试的50名学生。收集了医学学生在MBBS儿科最终考试中的MCQ和MEQ得分,并使用SPSS进行了分析。结果:52%的学生获得A和B评分,46%的学生获得C评分,2%的学生获得D评分,没有人获得F评分。MCQ,MEQ和综合得分的平均百分比分别为75.03%,79.99%和76.68%。 MCQ,MEQ和组合的标准偏差(SD)分别为0.0753、0.0763和0.0559,均值和SD均无显着差异。 MCQ和MEQ之间的相关性(CR)为-1.73%。得分为A和B的人的MCQ和MEQ之间的CR为7.38%,这可能表示+ ve CR弱但显着(p值0.017),(表3)。对于那些得分为C的人,在MCQ和MEQ之间观察到了反向CR(-74.38%)。讨论:这项研究的主要发现是学生在MCQs和MEQs上的表现呈弱负CR。 MCQ中的良好性能不一定与LEQ中的良好性能相关。这与Oyebola等人的观点不一致。 Moqattash等人的发现,他们的学生表现为积极的CR。 MCQ和MEQ之间在表现上的差异可以用主观性和避免在设定和标记论文问题上产生偏差的困难来解释。关键词:多项选择题,修改后的长篇论文题,相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号