...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock >Validation of Predicting Hyperglycemic Crisis Death Score: A Risk Stratification Tool for Appropriate Disposition of Hyperglycemic Crisis Patients from the Emergency Department
【24h】

Validation of Predicting Hyperglycemic Crisis Death Score: A Risk Stratification Tool for Appropriate Disposition of Hyperglycemic Crisis Patients from the Emergency Department

机译:高血糖危机死亡评分预测的验证:急诊科适当处置高血糖危机患者的风险分层工具

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Predicting hyperglycemic crisis death (PHD) score is a simple, rapid tool with six independent mortality predictors to calculate 30-day mortality and appropriately dispose patients to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or ward. Aims: This study aimed at validating the efficiency of PHD score as a decision rule for prognosticating 30-day mortality and classifying hyperglycemic crisis patients for appropriate disposition from the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, observational study done in the ED of a teaching hospital over 14 months. All patients aged >18 years and who met the criteria of hyperglycemic crisis were enrolled. Thirty-day mortality of six independent predictors was the primary end point. Using PHD, risk scores were calculated and patients were disposed as per physician's clinical judgment. Finally, the treating physician's decision and PHD score disposition were compared and the efficiency of PHD in predicting 30-day mortality was analyzed. Multiple logistic regression models were used for analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and area under the curve along with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was analyzed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 133 patients were included. On applying PHD score, 69, 39, and 25 patients were in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively, with a mortality rate of 5.8%, 20.5%, and 56%, respectively. On comparing physician disposition with PHD score, an increasing mortality was noticed in ICU, and PHD showed equal weight in risk stratification and appropriate disposition of patients. Conclusion: In adult patients with hyperglycemic crisis, PHD score is validated as a straightforward, prompt tool for predicting 30-day mortality and aids in disposition. The mortality rate in the PHD score Model II was similar to the physician's clinical decision.
机译:背景:预测高血糖危机死亡(PHD)评分是一种简单,快速的工具,具有六个独立的死亡率预测因子,可计算30天死亡率,并将患者适当地送至重症监护病房(ICU)或病房。目的:本研究旨在验证PHD评分的效率,作为预测30天死亡率的决策规则,并对高血糖危机患者进行分类,以便由急诊科(ED)进行适当处理。材料和方法:这是在教学医院的急诊室进行的为期14个月的前瞻性观察性研究。所有年龄大于18岁且符合高血糖危象标准的患者均入选。六个独立预测因素的30天死亡率是主要终点。使用PHD,计算风险评分,并根据医师的临床判断处置患者。最后,比较了主治医师的决定和PHD评分配置,分析了PHD预测30天死亡率的效率。使用多个逻辑回归模型进行分析。绘制受试者的工作特征曲线,并分析其下的面积以及敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。 P <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:共纳入133例患者。应用PHD评分时,低,中和高风险组分别有69、39和25例患者,死亡率分别为5.8%,20.5%和56%。通过比较医师处置与PHD评分,在ICU中发现死亡率增加,并且PHD在风险分层和适当处置患者方面显示出相等的权重。结论:在患有高血糖危机的成年患者中,PHD评分被证实是预测30天死亡率和辅助处置的直接,快速的工具。 PHD评分模型II中的死亡率与医师的临床决定相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号