...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dental education >Comparing Comprehensive Care and Departmental Clinical Education Models: Studentsa?? Perceptions at the University of Tennessee College of Dentistry
【24h】

Comparing Comprehensive Care and Departmental Clinical Education Models: Studentsa?? Perceptions at the University of Tennessee College of Dentistry

机译:比较综合护理和部门临床教育模式:学生a?田纳西大学牙科学院的看法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

pIn summer 2012, the University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Dentistry transitioned from a departmental clinical education model to a comprehensive care/group leader model. The aim of this study was to investigate the perspectives of the fourth-year class of dental students who, because the transition took place during their training, had experienced treating patients under both educational models. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire was designed to assess the studentsa?? opinions on the efficiency of their effort, availability of specialty faculty, stress, collaboration with classmates, and availability of exposure to different practice styles and techniques under the two systems. The students were also given an opportunity to provide open-ended feedback on the shortcomings and advantages of the systems. The Class of 2013 had 81 students, 55 of whom participated in the survey for a response rate of 67.9%. The majority (86%) of the respondents preferred the comprehensive care model and reported feeling that, in it, they were able to accomplish more comprehensive dentistry with greater consistency of supervision from faculty in a more patient-centered environment than in the departmental model. However, 56 percent considered having the same group leader for two years a disadvantage and recommended rotation of at least one group leader every six months. The results of this survey can help this college and other dental schools that are seeking to optimize their educational model to best serve studentsa?? educational experience and the dental needs of their patient population./p.
机译:> 2012年夏季,田纳西大学牙科大学健康科学中心大学从部门临床教育模式过渡到综合护理/小组负责人模式。这项研究的目的是调查牙科学生四年级的观点,这些学生由于在培训期间进行了过渡,因此在两种教育模式下都具有治疗患者的经验。为了实现这一目标,设计了一个问卷调查表来评估学生a?关于他们的工作效率,专业教师的可用性,压力,与同学的合作以及在两种系统下接触不同实践风格和技术的可用性的意见。学生们也有机会就系统的缺点和优势提供开放式反馈。 2013届共有81名学生,其中55名参加了调查,回答率为67.9%。大多数受访者(86%)更喜欢综合护理模式,并表示,与部门模式相比,他们能够在以患者为中心的环境中完成更全面的牙科护理,并获得教师的更大程度的监督。但是,有56%的人认为担任同一组长两年是不利的,并建议每六个月至少轮换一名组长。这项调查的结果可以帮助正在寻求优化其教育模式以最好地为学生服务的这所学院和其他牙科学校a?教育经验和患者群体的牙科需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号