首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business & Financial Affairs >High-frequency Trading–to Regulate or Not to Regulate-That is the Question? Does Scientific Data Offer an Answer?
【24h】

High-frequency Trading–to Regulate or Not to Regulate-That is the Question? Does Scientific Data Offer an Answer?

机译:高频交易-监管还是不监管-这是问题吗?科学数据能提供答案吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

High-frequency trading (HFT) certainly captures public (and regulatory) attention. On May 6" 2010, the Dow Jones (DJ) experienced its largest intraday point drop in history, shedding $1 trillion of its market value in half an hour. Largely as a consequence of the event- named Flash Crash-regulatory authorities sharpened the regulations concerning HFT: in the US., circuit breakers were introduced [1], and the European Union made regulative changes that require equity orders to delay for at least halfa second. Also, in the markets, there has been a demand for introducing a financial transactions tax (FTT) in order to discourage high frequency trading.
机译:高频交易(HFT)无疑引起了公众(和监管)的关注。 “在2010年5月6日,道琼斯(DJ)经历了历史上最大的盘中跌幅,在半小时内下跌了1万亿美元的市值。这主要是由于名为Flash Crash的事件而受到监管机构的严格监管关于HFT:在美国,引入了断路器[1],并且欧盟进行了法规更改,要求将股票定单至少延迟半秒钟。此外,在市场上,也需要引入金融交易。交易税(FTT),以阻止高频交易。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号