首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes
【24h】

Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes

机译:传统和极简主义运动鞋的跑步者的下肢生物力学和自我报告的步行方式

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: The injury incidence rate among runners is approximately 50%. Some individuals have advocated using an anterior–foot-strike pattern to reduce ground reaction forces and injury rates that they attribute to a rear–foot-strike pattern. The proportion of minimalist shoe wearers who adopt an anterior–foot-strike pattern remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of self-reported foot-strike patterns, compare negative ankle- and knee-joint angular work among runners using different foot-strike patterns and wearing traditional or minimalist shoes, and describe average vertical-loading rates. Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 60 healthy volunteers (37 men, 23 women; age = 34.9 ± 8.9 years, height = 1.74 ± 0.08 m, mass = 70.9 ± 13.4 kg) with more than 6 months of experience wearing traditional or minimalist shoes were instructed to classify their foot-strike patterns. Intervention(s): Participants ran in their preferred shoes on an instrumented treadmill with 3-dimensional motion capture. Main Outcome Measure(s): Self-reported foot-strike patterns were compared with 2-dimensional video assessments. Runners were classified into 3 groups based on video assessment: traditional-shoe rear-foot strikers (TSR; n = 22), minimalist-shoe anterior-foot strikers (MSA; n = 21), and minimalist-shoe rear-foot strikers (MSR; n = 17). Ankle and knee negative angular work and average vertical-loading rates during stance phase were compared among groups. Results: Only 41 (68.3%) runners reported foot-strike patterns that agreed with the video assessment (κ = 0.42, P < .001). The TSR runners demonstrated greater ankle-dorsiflexion and knee-extension negative work than MSA and MSR runners (P < .05). The MSA (P < .001) and MSR (P = .01) runners demonstrated greater ankle plantar-flexion negative work than TSR runners. The MSR runners demonstrated a greater average vertical-loading rate than MSA and TSR runners (P < .001). Conclusions: Runners often cannot report their foot-strike patterns accurately and may not automatically adopt an anterior–foot-strike pattern after transitioning to minimalist running shoes.
机译:背景:跑步者的受伤发生率约为50%。一些人提倡使用前脚踩模式来减少地面反作用力和归因于后脚踩模式的伤害率。采用前脚踩模式的极简主义穿鞋者比例尚不清楚。目的:要评估自我报告的足部锻炼方式的准确性,比较使用不同的足部锻炼方式并穿着传统或极简主义鞋子的跑步者在脚踝和膝盖关节处的负角运动,并描述平均垂直负荷率。设计:描述性实验室研究。地点:研究实验室。患者或其他参与者:总共60名健康志愿者(37位男性,23位女性;年龄= 34.9±8.9岁,身高= 1.74±0.08 m,体重= 70.9±13.4 kg),拥有超过6个月的传统或极简主义经验鞋子被指示对他们的步行方式进行分类。干预:参与者穿着他们喜欢的鞋子,在带有3D动作捕捉功能的跑步机上跑步。主要观察指标:将自我报告的足部搏动模式与二维视频评估进行比较。根据视频评估,跑步者分为三组:传统鞋后脚前锋(TSR; n = 22),简约鞋前脚前锋(MSA; n = 21)和简约鞋后脚前锋(( MSR; n = 17)。比较各组脚踝和膝关节负角功和站立阶段的平均垂直负荷率。结果:只有41位(68.3%)的跑步者报告了与视频评估相符的踩脚模式(κ= 0.42,P <.001)。与MSA和MSR跑步者相比,TSR跑步者表现出更大的踝背屈和负伸能力(P <.05)。 MSA(P <.001)和MSR(P = .01)跑步者表现出比TSR跑步者更大的踝plant屈负性功。 MSR流道比MSA和TSR流道具有更高的平均垂直载荷率(P <.001)。结论:跑步者通常无法准确报告其脚部搏动模式,并且在过渡到简约跑鞋后可能无法自动采用前脚部搏动模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号