...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >A comparison of equisedative infusions of propofol and midazolam for conscious sedation during spinal anesthesia - A prospective randomized study
【24h】

A comparison of equisedative infusions of propofol and midazolam for conscious sedation during spinal anesthesia - A prospective randomized study

机译:异丙酚和咪达唑仑等剂量输注脊髓麻醉期间清醒镇静的比较-前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background : Supplemental sedation with an intravenous agent is often required to allay fear and anxiety in patients subjected to spinal anesthesia .We studied and compared the properties of propofol and midazolam as equisedative continuous infusions. Patients & Methods: 100, ASA grade 1 and 2 patients, 18 to 60 years of age, undergoing spinal anesthesia, were randomly allocated to receive either propofol 1mg/ml or midazolam 0.1mg/ml in 50ml syringes through syringe pump. The infusion rates were titrated in order to maintain a desired sedation score of 4 on the Observer's assessment of alertness/ sedation scale. Anxiety score was assessed at regular intervals by a single observer in all cases, using a 100mm visual analog scale.Intraoperative and postoperative amnesia was assessed using visual task of recall of pictures and verbal task of recall of words. Results: Propofol infusion was found to be superior to that of midazolam as it showed a statistically significant faster onset in achieving the desired sedation score, significantly lower mean anxiety scores, a clear headed, rapid recovery and significantly lesser postoperative impairment of recall, but midazolam infusion was seen to be associated with deeper intraoperative amnesia over the former which was beneficial. Conclusion: Equisedatine infusion of propofol & midazolam as an adjunct & spinal anesthesia offer good anxiolysis and cardio respiratory stability. Propofol her faster onset & recovery while midazolam provides better intraoperative annesia.
机译:背景:脊髓麻醉患者通常需要补充镇静剂以减轻恐惧和焦虑。我们研究并比较了异丙酚和咪达唑仑作为等价连续输注的性质。患者与方法:100名18至60岁年龄在18至60岁的ASA 1级和2级患者接受了脊髓麻醉,通过注射泵随机分配接受50ml注射器中的异丙酚1mg / ml或咪达唑仑0.1mg / ml。滴定输注速率,以使观察者的警觉性/镇静量表的镇静评分保持在4。在所有情况下,均由一名观察员使用100mm视觉模拟量表定期评估焦虑评分,并通过视觉记忆图片和言语记忆评估术中和术后健忘症。结果:发现丙泊酚输注优于咪达唑仑,因为它在实现所需的镇静分数上具有统计学上显着的起效快,平均焦虑评分显着降低,头脑清晰,恢复快并且术后召回障碍明显减少,但是咪达唑仑输注被认为与术前较深的术中遗忘症有关,这是有益的。结论:异丙酚和咪达唑仑的等值静注输注可作为辅助麻醉和脊柱麻醉,具有良好的抗焦虑作用和心脏呼吸稳定性。丙泊酚起病和恢复较快,而咪达唑仑可提供更好的术中健忘症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号