首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Mental Health >Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study
【24h】

Public Attitudes Toward Guided Internet-Based Therapies: Web-Based Survey Study

机译:公众对基于Internet的指导疗法的态度:基于Web的调查研究

获取原文

摘要

Background Internet interventions have been proposed to improve the accessibility and use of evidence-based psychological treatments. However, little is known about attitudes toward such treatments, which can be an important barrier to their use. Objective This study aimed to (1) determine attitudes toward guided internet interventions, (2) assess its acceptability compared with other internet-based formats, and (3) explore predictors of acceptance. Methods A convenience-sample Web-based survey (N=646) assessed attitudes toward guided internet therapies (ie, perceived usefulness and helpfulness, and advantage relative to face-to-face therapy), preferences for delivery modes (ie, e-preference: guided internet interventions, unguided internet interventions, or videoconferencing psychotherapy), and potential predictors of attitudes and preferences: sociodemographics, help-seeking–related variables, attachment style, and perceived stress. Results Although most participants perceived internet interventions as useful or helpful (426/646, 65.9%), a few indicated their advantage relative to face-to-face therapy (56/646, 8.7%). Most participants preferred guided internet interventions (252/646, 39.0%) over videoconferencing psychotherapy (147/646, 22.8%), unguided internet interventions (124/646, 19.2%), and not using internet interventions (121/646, 18.8%; missing data: 1/646, 0.2%). Attachment avoidance and stress were related to e-preference (all P 26=12.8; P =.046). Conclusions Participants assessed therapist-guided internet interventions as helpful, but not equivalent to face-to-face therapies. The vast majority (523/646, 81.0%) of the participants were potentially willing to use internet-based approaches. In lieu of providing patients with only one specific low-intensity treatment, implementation concepts should offer several options, including guided internet interventions, but not limited to them. Conversely, our results also indicate that efforts should focus on increasing public knowledge about internet interventions, including information about their effectiveness, to promote acceptance and uptake.
机译:背景技术已经提出了互联网干预措施以改善基于证据的心理治疗的可及性和使用。然而,人们对这种治疗的态度知之甚少,这可能成为其使用的重要障碍。目的本研究旨在(1)确定对互联网引导性干预的态度,(2)与其他基于互联网的格式相比,评估其可接受性,(3)探索接受度的预测因子。方法:基于网络的便利性样本调查(N = 646)评估了对指导性互联网疗法的态度(即,感知的有用性和有用性以及相对于面对面治疗的优势),对交付方式的偏好(即电子偏好) :有指导的互联网干预,无指导的互联网干预或视频会议心理治疗),以及态度和偏好的潜在预测因素:社会人口统计学,与求助有关的变量,依恋风格和感知压力。结果尽管大多数参与者认为互联网干预是有用或有帮助的(426 / 646,65.9%),但仍有少数人表示相对于面对面治疗有优势(56 / 646,8.7%)。与视频会议心理治疗(147/646,22.8%)相比,大多数参与者更喜欢引导式互联网干预(252/646,39.0%),非引导式互联网干预(124/646,19.2%)和不使用互联网干预(121/646,18.8%) ;缺少数据:1 / 646,0.2%)。依恋避免和压力与电子偏好有关(所有P 2 6 = 12.8; P = .046)。结论参加者认为治疗师指导的互联网干预是有帮助的,但并不等同于面对面的治疗。绝大多数(523 / 646,81.0%)的参与者可能愿意使用基于互联网的方法。代替仅为患者提供一种特定的低强度治疗,实施概念应提供几种选择,包括指导性的互联网干预措施,但不仅限于此。相反,我们的结果也表明,应将努力的重点放在增加公众对互联网干预的知识,包括有关其有效性的信息上,以促进接受和采用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号