首页> 外文期刊>Dose-response >“Bad Luck Mutations”: DNA Mutations Are not the Whole Answer to Understanding Cancer Risk
【24h】

“Bad Luck Mutations”: DNA Mutations Are not the Whole Answer to Understanding Cancer Risk

机译:“不幸的突变”:DNA突变并不是理解癌症风险的完整答案

获取原文
           

摘要

It has been proposed that many human cancers are generated by intrinsic mechanisms that produce “Bad Luck” mutations by the proliferation of organ-specific adult stem cells. There have been serious challenges to this interpretation, including multiple extrinsic factors thought to be correlated with mutations found in cancers associated with these exposures. While support for both interpretations provides some validity, both interpretations ignore several concepts of the multistage, multimechanism process of carcinogenesis, namely, (1) mutations can be generated by both “errors of DNA repair” and “errors of DNA replication,” during the “initiation” process of carcinogenesis; (2) “initiated” stem cells must be clonally amplified by nonmutagenic, intrinsic or extrinsic epigenetic mechanisms; (3) organ-specific stem cell numbers can be modified during in utero development, thereby altering the risk to cancer later in life; and (4) epigenetic tumor promoters are characterized by species, individual genetic-, gender-, developmental state-specificities, and threshold levels to be active; sustained and long-term exposures; and exposures in the absence of antioxidant “antipromoters.” Because of the inevitability of some of the stem cells generating “initiating” mutations by either “errors of DNA repair” or “errors of DNA replication,” a tumor is formed depending on the promotion phase of carcinogenesis. While it is possible to reduce our frequencies of mutagenic “initiated” cells, one can never reduce it to zero. Because of the extended period of the promotion phase of carcinogenesis, strategies to reduce the appearance of cancers must involve the interruption of the promotion of these initiated cells.
机译:已经提出许多人类癌症是由内在机制产生的,该内在机制通过器官特异性成年干细胞的增殖而产生“ Bad Luck”突变。这种解释面临着严峻的挑战,包括被认为与与这些暴露相关的癌症中发现的突变相关的多种外在因素。虽然对这两种解释的支持都提供了一定的有效性,但两种解释都忽略了致癌作用的多阶段,多机制过程的几个概念,即(1)突变可能由“ DNA修复错误”和“ DNA复制错误”产生。癌变的“开始”过程; (2)必须通过非诱变,内在或外在的表观遗传机制克隆“起始”的干细胞; (3)在子宫内发育过程中可以改变器官特异性干细胞的数量,从而改变生命后期罹患癌症的风险; (4)表观遗传的肿瘤启动子的特征是物种,个体的遗传,性别,发育状态特异性以及活跃的阈值水平;持续和长期接触;和在没有抗氧化剂“抗促进剂”的情况下接触。由于某些干细胞不可避免地会因“ DNA修复错误”或“ DNA复制错误”而产生“起始”突变,因此根据癌变的促进阶段会形成肿瘤。尽管可以降低诱变“起始”细胞的频率,但永远无法将其降低为零。由于致癌促进阶段的延长,减少癌症出现的策略必须涉及这些起始细胞的促进的中断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号