首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine >A comparative study of cone-beam CT and multidetector CT in the preoperative assessment of odontogenic cysts and tumors
【24h】

A comparative study of cone-beam CT and multidetector CT in the preoperative assessment of odontogenic cysts and tumors

机译:锥形束CT与多探测器CT在牙源性囊肿和肿瘤术前评估中的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Aim of the work To compare the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) and multidetector CT (MDCT) in the preoperative radiological assessment of odontogenic cysts and tumors. Material and methods This prospective study included 24 patients (13 males and 11 females) with primary untreated pathologically proven odontogenic cysts and tumors. Their ages ranged from 5–45 years. They underwent (CBCT) and (MDCT). All CBCT and MDCT images were reviewed for morphologic characteristics of the lesions, internal appearance, extension as well as effect on surrounding structures. All patients were scheduled for surgical treatment within one week after clinical and radiological evaluation. Using intra-operative findings as the gold standard, the accuracy of (CBCT) and (MDCT) for radiological assessment of odontogenic cyst and tumors was compared. Results Histopathologic examination established that of the 24 tumors; 10 were radicular cyst, five dentigerous cyst, three amelobalstoma, three odontogenic keratocyst, one buccal bifurcation cyst, one nasopalatine cyst, and one lateral periodontal cyst. Both CBCT and MDCT were identical in detecting location, borders and internal structure of examined lesions. Concerning linear measurements of the lesions, MDCT underestimated mean depth by 1.7 mm and CBCT underestimated it by 0.9 mm. MDCT underestimated the mean width by 0.9 mm, and CBCT underestimated it by 0.7 mm. MDCT overestimated the mean height by 1.7 mm and CBCT overestimated it by 1 mm. CBCT was superior than MDCT in detecting thinning and perforation of buccal cortical plate and displacement of teeth. Conclusion In the overall assessment of odontogenic cysts and tumors, CBCT was comparable with MDCT with no significant statistical difference ( P 0.05). However, CBCT was more accurate in linear measurements and identification of tooth displacement and buccal bone defect. It is an optimal radiological modality for preoperative radiological assessment of odontogenic tumors.
机译:工作目的比较锥束CT(CBCT)和多探测器CT(MDCT)在牙源性囊肿和肿瘤的术前放射学评估中的准确性。材料和方法这项前瞻性研究包括24例未经病理学证实的原牙牙本质囊肿和肿瘤的患者(13例男性和11例女性)。他们的年龄介于5至45岁之间。他们经历了(CBCT)和(MDCT)。检查所有CBCT和MDCT图像的病变形态特征,内部外观,扩展以及对周围结构的影响。所有患者均计划在临床和放射学评估后的一周内接受手术治疗。以术中发现为金标准,比较了(CBCT)和(MDCT)在牙源性囊肿和肿瘤的放射学评估中的准确性。结果组织病理学检查证实了这24个肿瘤。 10个是放射状囊肿,5个齿状囊肿,3个疣状囊肿,3个牙源性角化囊肿,1个颊分叉囊肿,1个鼻op囊肿和1个牙周外侧囊肿。 CBCT和MDCT在检测病灶的位置,边界和内部结构方面均相同。关于病变的线性测量,MDCT低估了平均深度1.7 mm,CBCT低估了0.9 mm。 MDCT低估了0.9 mm的平均宽度,而CBCT低估了0.7 mm的平均宽度。 MDCT高估了平均高度1.7 mm,而CBCT高估了1 mm。 CBCT在检测颊皮质板变薄和穿孔以及牙齿移位方面优于MDCT。结论在牙源性囊肿和肿瘤的总体评估中,CBCT与MDCT相当,无统计学差异(P <0.05)。然而,CBCT在线性测量和识别牙齿位移和颊骨缺损方面更准确。这是对牙源性肿瘤进行术前放射学评估的最佳放射学方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号