Standard Surgical Approaches to Primary Choledocholithiasis — Definitive VersusTemporary Decompression

摘要

The occurrence of retained/recurrent calculi after primary CBDE followed by temporary T-tubedecompression, have remained at rates varying from 5.4% to 20.9% over the last 10 years in spite ofsophisticated pre and intraoperative imaging techniques. It is postulated that a functional obstruction,due to dysmotility of the SO, lies behind most stone-containing ducts. Thus it seems logical to us that apermanent “fenestration” should be the management of most such ducts.We prospectively followed-up, for one to 10 years, two groups of patients submitted to primaryCBDE aiming to assess the short and long-term results of two different surgical approaches to ductlithiasis. In one (Group A) 162 CBDE's were performed, out of 680 CHE's (24%), with a “positivity” of 68% and in the other (Group B) 80 CBDE's, out of 438 CHE's (18%), with a “positivity” of 70%. In Group A a T-tube decompression was used in 79(49%) and a definitive drainage in 83(51%) whereas in Group B the T-tube was employed in only 3(4%) and some form of permanent “fenestration” in 77(96%). There were no significant differences between the operative mortality rates, which were 2.5% in Group A (1 death post T-tube, 3 post CDJ) and 1.3% in Group B (1 death post CDD). The long-term results, though, were significantly worse among patients of Group A whose ducts were temporarilydecompressed: 10/79 (12.7%) required further aggressive interventional therapy for retained/recurrentstones while only 3.8% (3/80) in Group A and 1.3% (1/76) in Group B required revisional surgery forbilio-digestive anastomotic complications with cholangitis.It is concluded that it is against the long-term efficiency of the approach utilized in Group B that thenew laparoscopic techniques should be compared.