assessments for non-checklist (NCL) SO and 697 for the CLcohort. Increasing numbers of SO patients correlated withincreased SO duration (Pearson r = 0.74, P 0.0001). CL did notimpact the mean number of SO patients per minute (CL mean ±standard deviation [SD] = 0.86 ± 0.31, NCL mean ± SD = 0.86 ±0.23). VAS assessment of SO improved to 8 (range 2.5 to 10; P 0.0001) for CL compared to 7.5 (0.5 - 0.95) for NCL. Importantaspects of SO improved with implementation of CL (see Table):tasks, disposition, and necessity of attending clarification. Overall,comparison of oncoming and departing attending physician globalassessment SO scores manifested low interobserver agreement(intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.39;, 95% confidenceinterval,CI -0.26 to 0.70). Oncoming and departing attendingsperceived significantly improved SO global VAS assessments forthe CL cohort (CL mean ± SD = 8.3 ± 0.55;, NCL mean ± SD =7.0 ± 1.2; P 0.0001 and CL mean ± SD = 7.6 ± 1.1;, NCL mean± SD = 7.0 ± 1.1; P = 0.05, respectively).
展开▼
机译：非检查清单（NCL）SO评估和CLcohort评估697。 SO患者数量的增加与SO持续时间的增加相关（Pearson r = 0.74，P <0.0001）。 CL不会影响每分钟SO患者的平均数（CL平均值±标准差[SD] = 0.86±0.31，NCL平均值±SD = 0.86±0.23）。对CL的SO的VAS评估改进为8（范围为2.5到10; P <0.0001），而对NCL则为7.5（0.5-0.95）。通过实施CL改善了SO的重要方面（见表）：任务，处置和参加澄清的必要性。总体而言，即将来临和即将离开的主治医师全球评估SO评分的比较表明观察者之间的一致性较低（组内相关系数= 0.39; 95％置信区间，CI -0.26至0.70）。即将到来和离开的与会者对CL队列的SO全球VAS评估得到了显着改善（CL平均值±SD = 8.3±0.55; NCL平均值±SD = 7.0±1.2; P <0.0001和CL平均值±SD = 7.6±1.1; NCL平均值± SD = 7.0±1.1; P = 0.05）。
展开▼
