首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >The Incidence of Septic Patients Identified Using a Sepsis Order Bundle
【24h】

The Incidence of Septic Patients Identified Using a Sepsis Order Bundle

机译:使用败血症令包识别的败血症患者的发病率

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: Sepsis order sets improve compliance with the established guidelines, but clinicians must be careful to initiate these protocols on appropriate patients. Many conditions can mimic sepsis as defined by SEP-1 (two or more SIRS* criteria and a suspected infection) such as trauma, COPD, etc. SEP-1 criteria alone can lead to initiating a sepsis protocol without true infection based solely on vital signs. Objective: To assess the incidence of patients who had a sepsis order set, but an infection was not discovered during their hospital course. Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective chart review of all “SIRS positive” patients 21 years old who presented to a busy community ED who had the sepsis order set initiated from the emergency department in 2017. A total of 1577 encounters met inclusion criteria. The discharge diagnoses were reviewed to identify unique diagnoses. Similar diagnoses (e.g. RLQ abdominal pain and abdominal pain) were grouped together into the more generalized diagnosis. Several of the unique discharge diagnoses (161) were vague and required individual chart review by two people. Results: Two hundred fifty-one unique discharge diagnoses were identified and then categorized as infectious or not. Conditions which may be inflammatory versus infectious (e.g. diverticulitis), but are classically treated with antibiotics were counted as infectious. One hundred sixty-one charts were reviewed by two physicians, of which, 130 (81%) were identified as having an infectious condition (K = 0.87). The most common sepsis mimic was abdominal pain, followed by COPD, and cough. A third (33.6%) did not have an infection identified. Conclusion: SEP-1 criteria for diagnosis and treating sepsis are not specific, with one-third false positives. Identification criteria with higher specificity is needed, and may reduce healthcare expense. *SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) is defined as temperature 38C° or 20 or PaCO2 12k or 4k/mm3.
机译:简介:脓毒症治疗组可改善对既定指南的依从性,但临床医生必须谨慎对待适当的患者以启动这些方案。许多情况可以模仿SEP-1(两个或多个SIRS *标准和可疑感染)定义的败血症,例如创伤,COPD等。单独使用SEP-1标准可以导致没有真正基于单纯生命危险的真正感染的脓毒症治疗方案迹象。目的:评估患有脓毒症但未在医院疗程中发现感染的患者的发生率。方法:本研究是单中心回顾性图表回顾,回顾了所有> 21岁>到繁忙的社区急诊室的> SIRS阳性患者,这些急诊室在2017年由急诊部门发起了脓毒症调查。总共遇到了1577次纳入标准。审查出院诊断以识别独特的诊断。将类似的诊断(例如RLQ腹痛和腹痛)归为更广义的诊断。几个独特的出院诊断(161)含糊不清,需要两个人对每个图表进行单独检查。结果:鉴定了251个独特的出院诊断,然后将其分类为是否具有传染性。可能是炎性与传染性的疾病(例如憩室炎),但经过经典的抗生素治疗后,才被视为传染性疾病。两位医生对161张病历进行了审查,其中130张(81%)被确定为具有传染病(K = 0.87)。最常见的败血症模拟是腹痛,其次是COPD和咳嗽。三分之一(33.6%)未发现感染。结论:SEP-1诊断和治疗败血症的标准不明确,假阳性率为三分之一。需要具有更高特异性的鉴定标准,并且可以减少医疗费用。 * SIRS(全身性炎症反应综合征)的定义为温度> 38°C或20或PaCO2 12k或<4k / mm3。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号